The D.C. Catholic Archdiocese has threatened to stop helping thousands of the needy in the nation's capital if the District's City Council approves a pending bill which states that marriage between 2 people in the District of Columbia shall not be denied or limited on the basis of gender, and which also ensure[s] that no minister of any religious society who is authorized to celebrate marriages shall be required to celebrate any marriage...or solemnization of a same-sex marriage.
This is not how we show compassion, ease suffering or let God do the judging.
So-and-so "needs a sandwich" talk sucks too. It's also worth remembering that eating disorders are illnesses, not personal moral failings (cultural culpability is another matter entirely); people with anorexia aren't bad people, they are people with anorexia.
So confronting skinny privilege/expectation? Good! Saying that a given level of skinniness looks sickly to you? Fine! Blithely making the Holocaust comparison or judging people who have various nutrient absorbtion diseases or eating disorders? Not cool.
βHe would sew in the dark every night, except for a small desk light. His hands would flutter up like a moth to the light,β she said. βI found the image so lonely and sad, but somehow soothing. Maybe because I was lonely, too. It gave me comfort.β
Me: "I'm going abroad in a couple of days and want to know if my phone will work."
Them: "Will you be leaving the country?"
Me: "That's what abroad means."
- I've called my bank
- I've rented a mobile for there
- I'll do all cat-related errands tonight
- this just leaves currency exchange and packing tomorrow
- I also, unrelatedly, but hey important phone calls, played more phone tag with the headshot guy.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 03:14 pm (UTC)Word.
This is the first article about Malcom X's bisexuality (http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/may/19/gayrights.usa).
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 05:31 pm (UTC)I've been very underweight (also due to a medical condition) as well as somewhat overweight and found the comments about weight were much worse when I was heavy. Just my experience.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 03:16 pm (UTC)ETA: yes, she did. it was
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 03:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 03:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 03:23 pm (UTC)Wow, that is... wow. Like, seriously, wow. I can't even begin to comprehend the dimensions of the "Wow."
In what bizarro-world is blackmail and holding the needy as hostages even remotely ethical, moral, or all of them things that are supposed to spring from God?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 04:07 pm (UTC)The whole threat is sort of a crock anyway, IMHO, since the church would get an injunction and spend ten years dragging the law through the courts before they would voluntarily shutting down. And maybe it is about time that we started experimenting with whether we can dispense charity as a society without so much of the reactionary morality.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 03:27 pm (UTC)And I went, "WHAT?!" Apparently, this guy Jonathan Leaf was on a Christian talk show, discussing his new book or something. I listened for a minute until they had a caller call in who screeched about how Martin Luther King Jr. held "wild, perverse sexy orgies!" and then I had to switch. But yeah, I've heard the Malcom X thing before, I just heard it in a really shitty way. XP
Also, if you are interested- Ed Reggi is organizing a protest of the Saint Louis Archdiocesan, which I know- not in your area, but, this is because of this:
http://www.stltoday.com/blogzone/civil-religion/catholic/2009/11/carlson-gave-cash-from-archdioceses-special-needs-fund-to-fight-gay-marriage-in-maine/
One wonders how they still keep their tax exempt status.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 03:28 pm (UTC)Ugh, thank you. You can say "she looks too thin," and it be enough; you really don't have to be insensitive on top of it.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 04:26 pm (UTC)I am inclined to disagree, as that sounds like ableist language. I don't so much mind someone having aesthetic standards based around body shape, but there is an important distinction between speaking actively about _your_ standards and speaking passively about _her_ shape. Saying that someone looks sickly is as misguided as saying that they sound insane; if you're not qualified to make a medical diagnosis then choose your words with more care.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 04:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 04:44 pm (UTC)It's also deeply weird to see a gay rights campaigner like Tatchell cheerfully reproducing old Freudian chestnuts about how men become gay:
The last time I saw that kind of argument, it was coming from Christian "therapists" who claimed they could cure homosexuality. Surely Tatchell knows better.
While I'm absolutely in sympathy with what I gather is his political purpose--correcting the invisibility of black lesbian, gay, and bisexual people--he's going about it in a problematic and not very helpful way.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 04:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 05:06 pm (UTC)Them: "Will you be leaving the country?"
Me: "That's what abroad means."
I love this. I think we should redefine Abroad to mean ADVENTURING INTO THE COUNTRYSIDE. It conjures images of people striding along the highways and byways of the country, clad in sturdy boots and corduroy trousers, carrying a dollar in their pocket and a knapsack on their back, a song in their hears and a smile on their face.
"Where are you going?" "I don't know! ABROAD."
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 05:09 pm (UTC)Word.
I'd also like to do away with 'she looks prepubescent'/'she looks like a twelve-year-old boy'/'real women are curvy.' Not so much because they're unfair to think people -- I do realize that it's thin people that are privileged in our society -- but because policing what a 'real' adult woman is or is not like strikes me as pretty awful. There's enough awful policing of gender normativity standards as it is.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-13 04:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 05:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 06:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 07:02 pm (UTC)Thanks so much for linking to the defictionalization article. My favorite part:
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 09:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 07:23 pm (UTC)That's not only counter to absolutely anything I was ever taught back in the day when I was Catholic (and in a really conservative, Opus Dei-run school), it begs the question wtf they think the problem is specific to DC. Because Catholic Charities is still alive and well here in CT, and we've been doing same-sex marriage here for a year as of today. I've yet to hear of them having any issues around benefits for same-sex spouses, though I don't know whether that's because it just hasn't come up yet or whether it's because they have some sort of exemption or what. There certainly haven't been any noises about them pulling up stakes to RI or something. So yeah, not only bigotted and unethical but also bizarre.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 08:37 pm (UTC)When did people stop understanding what abroad means?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-12 09:12 pm (UTC)http://www.detnews.com/article/20091112/NATION/911120406/1020/rss09
no subject
Date: 2009-11-13 01:36 am (UTC)And the suicide rate among the disabled is much higher than it is among the healthy.
So with you on the skinnybashing. I had crappy self-confidence for years because of being teased about my boniness. Skinny people are just as victimized by messed-up societal ideals, but some fat activists think it's okay to hate on them. Not okay.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-13 04:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-13 05:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-13 03:09 pm (UTC)