sundries

Dec. 16th, 2009 12:26 pm
[personal profile] rm
  • So, I am thinking, a pair of eye-glasses to replace my snapped cat-eyes ones and a pair of square-ish wire-rims with those transitions lenses so I can have prescription sunglasses on the cruise. Y/Y?

  • From the Department of WTF BBC: Should homosexuals be executed? I'm having a hard time cogently responding to this, but the very short version: you just apologized to Alan Turing, who, btw, helped save your asses in WWII. Doesn't that tell you the damn answer?

  • [livejournal.com profile] keori gives us an amazingly detailed overview of the history of impact of DADT.

  • Fela's Women.

  • Have now seen all the abstracts for Bristol.

  • I was weirdly and freakishly charmed by Stephen Colbert rapping with Alicia Keys last night.

  • More reaction to and fallout from the Chartrand mess: here and here. This is about a lot more than pseudonyms; it's about how you get paid better if you talk about how much women suck and how women on the Internet literally pay the price for all that casual vitriol from men fictive and not.

  • Design the next NYC condom package.

  • In India a call has gone out for volunteers to marry sex-workers to get them out of the biz (via [livejournal.com profile] catdancerz). This one's complicated and interesting.

  • About being a marginalized person and the expectation that you be willing to educate others about it in a way that considers their feelings, often more than your own. via [livejournal.com profile] i_am_schizo

  • Offered without my internal commentary: Looking young may mean living longer. via [livejournal.com profile] 00goddess on Twitter

  • Okay, so who exactly on the flist is going to Gallifrey One this year? I've actually lost track. Why do I need to know? Inappropriate trinket planning, of course.

  • Tomorrow Patty leaves for Ohio. This is *frowny face*. I will work and write like mad to catch up on everything (hi, Werewolves; hi Virtual Season; hi, ConSweet), and then when she returns on Jan 1, we get ready for the cruise!

  • Okay, actually, my book is back-ordered EVERYWHERE. I'm expecting the major e-tailers to get it in in time for Christmas shipping, but at this point am just not sure. I do have a decent stock of books in my house though, so if you want one and you're in the US and you need if for the holidays $14 via Paypal (sorry kids, I'm more than Amazon, list is $14.95) and I'll pick up the shipping and packing. Email or PM if interested.
  • Date: 2009-12-16 05:38 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] iamradar.livejournal.com
    I'll be attending Gallifrey.

    Date: 2009-12-16 05:39 pm (UTC)
    ext_3685: Stylized electric-blue teapot, with blue text caption "Brewster North" (Default)
    From: [identity profile] brewsternorth.livejournal.com
    So, I am thinking, a pair of eye-glasses to replace my snapped cat-eyes ones and a pair of square-ish wire-rims with those transitions lenses so I can have prescription sunglasses on the cruise. Y/Y?

    YYY. You might even be able to benefit from a b.o.g.o.f. deal with that sort of combination.

    /eta: I'll be at Gally, but you knew that (I'll be on the Flight of Cosplay).
    Edited Date: 2009-12-16 05:40 pm (UTC)

    Date: 2009-12-16 05:42 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
    Well, I have insurance credit towards it (only $70) and I usually actually do quite well at a lot of cheapy places, so I'm not that worried about it.

    I used to wear wire-rims all the time, and then they got hideously unfasionable, and mine were always oval not rectangleish, but I think they'll be snazzy with my whole man thing.

    And poor, poor Virgin America. Actually poor, poor Barnaby. I'm sort of plotting against him.
    Edited Date: 2009-12-16 05:45 pm (UTC)

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] marchek.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 06:10 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 06:12 pm (UTC) - Expand

    Gally Roll Call!

    Date: 2009-12-16 05:43 pm (UTC)
    (deleted comment)

    Date: 2009-12-16 06:14 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] aviv-b.livejournal.com
    Yeah, I'd go with Transitions if you have a minor correction.

    I have major correction with progresive multifocals so transition lenses don't work for me. My last few pairs have been small colored metal that come with integrated sunglasses. The sunglass piece is magnetized that 'clip' (for lack of a better term) on so you can't even tell that its an overlay. I currently have Takumi, but my previous ones were Harley Davidson.

    Not as easy as Transition lenses but probably the next best thing.

    Date: 2009-12-16 06:15 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] smirnoffmule.livejournal.com
    And here's us all thinking the BBC was run by the gay mafia...

    That's just so weird. I almost can't even get pissed off about it because it's so utterly out of character for the Beeb I can't even compute it as anything but the most ridiculous, enormous mistake by someone who's about to get massively fired, or that those Have Your Say questions must generated by a computer or a trained monkey (which would very much explain the usual quality of debate there).

    I can't find it now, so hopefully it's been taken down and burnt, and the monkey given a thorough spanking.

    Date: 2009-12-16 06:16 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
    Alas, [livejournal.com profile] brewsternorth gives us a link in comments.

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] smirnoffmule.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 06:28 pm (UTC) - Expand

    Date: 2009-12-16 06:29 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] kindkit.livejournal.com
    I'm actually not outraged about the BBC thing. Of course I believe that no one's civil rights should be up for debate. But right now, the bill to execute gay people really is up for debate in the Ugandan parliament. And discussion of it is taking place in an atmosphere of fear and repression. Uganda's civil rights record in general is not exactly exemplary, and the bill has provisions that I suspect are meant to make people afraid to speak out against it--it makes talking about homosexuality illegal and it requires people to turn in anyone they think might be gay or face charges of abetting. I think what the BBC was trying to do was create a forum in which people in Uganda could speak out in anonymity and without fear of reprisals.

    The BBC could have handled it better. But I think it's too easy for a westerner like me to stand back and say "No, this should not be a matter for debate!" when the debate is already happening and people's lives are at risk. The BBC is international, not subject to the Ugandan government, and as such it can provide one relatively safe space for people to oppose the bill.
    Edited Date: 2009-12-16 06:31 pm (UTC)

    Date: 2009-12-16 06:31 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
    My understanding is that the way the BBC handled it actual broke British law about hate speech. Hopefully the Brits reading this can speak to that.

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] brewsternorth.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 07:08 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] smirnoffmule.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 07:08 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] kindkit.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 07:26 pm (UTC) - Expand

    Date: 2009-12-16 06:39 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] eumelia.livejournal.com
    How the fuckity-fuck-fuck can this be a debate!?!?!
    I'm fairly speechless I dunno what to write!

    Date: 2009-12-17 01:21 am (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] woogledesigns.livejournal.com
    And yet it IS a debate in the world, right now, this minute and lives depend upon it. So, the question is how are you or I going to engage with it?

    Date: 2009-12-16 06:40 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] bodlon.livejournal.com
    - Y/Y.

    - Perhaps we should fire back with "I don't know, should journalists be executed?" I declare fuckery.

    - I have all kinds of reservations about the DSS sex worker marriage thing. It's the sort of thing that looks like a good idea on paper in a society that's functionally patriarchal, and I don't doubt that some of the men who've volunteered have good intentions, but the potential for going from one point of exploitation to another is so overtly there that I worry. OTOH, seeing a religious leader reaching out and treating sex workers like human beings and wanting to help those who aren't in a position to help themselves is good.

    - Writing my thing about the antho debate makes this blog post about educating others very timely, yes.

    - Congrats on your book being back-ordered! It's a drag, but it's a nice kind of drag on some level...

    Date: 2009-12-16 06:42 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
    re: book -- I just wish it would happen at like 8pm on the 24th, not on the 16th!

    re: sex workers -- it also opens up the discussion on AIDS there and potentially de-stigmatizes it on some level, so that's an interesting factor too.

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] bodlon.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 06:55 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 06:58 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] bodlon.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 07:02 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 07:05 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] bodlon.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 07:10 pm (UTC) - Expand

    Date: 2009-12-16 06:58 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] kel-reiley.livejournal.com
    pretty sure i'm out on gallifrey, just don't have the $$ for it :(
    but oh so jealous of everyone going!

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] kel-reiley.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-17 01:28 am (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] better-late24.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-17 01:28 am (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] kel-reiley.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-17 01:31 am (UTC) - Expand

    Date: 2009-12-16 07:20 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] 51stcenturyfox.livejournal.com
    Yup, Gallifrey. Going!

    Kel, maybe you can go in my suitcase. :)

    Date: 2009-12-16 07:42 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] neifile7.livejournal.com
    Hey. Between me and the coat, YOU AIN'T GONNA HAVE ROOM IN THERE.

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] 51stcenturyfox.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 07:49 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 09:05 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] 51stcenturyfox.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 09:11 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 09:17 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] 51stcenturyfox.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 09:30 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 09:37 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] 51stcenturyfox.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 09:49 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 09:53 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] delchi.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 11:23 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 11:24 pm (UTC) - Expand

    (no subject)

    From: [identity profile] delchi.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-16 11:26 pm (UTC) - Expand

    Date: 2009-12-16 08:44 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] eac.livejournal.com
    "Should homosexuals be executed?"

    What the hell? Why is the BBC giving marginal twits a forum to discuss this in the positive?!

    Date: 2009-12-16 09:14 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] thatwordgrrl.livejournal.com
    Gallifrey all de way! :>

    (note to self to ping Shaun about programming...)

    Date: 2009-12-16 09:18 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
    Let me know when you hear anything. I dropped him a line through the site when he posted to GB to do so, but I never heard anything and I both don't want to nag and also want to get on some of that programming.

    Date: 2009-12-16 09:34 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] jigglykat.livejournal.com
    I'm about 75% sure I'm going to Gallifrey. Will be making final plans by the end of December.

    Also COLBERT. I stopped watching just before their duet and I'M KICKING MYSELF.

    Date: 2009-12-16 11:28 pm (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] meirion.livejournal.com
    RE: looking younger: well, there has to be an upside to being carded when buying a tube of glue at 35, I suppose ...

    sunglasses

    Date: 2009-12-17 12:38 am (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] feyandstrange.livejournal.com
    If you are at all light-sensitive (light-eyed, meds, I forget if celiacs get light-sensitive) then I'd get actual sunglass tint on prescription lenses instead of transitions; it may be cheaper and it's almost certainly darker.

    Re: sunglasses

    Date: 2009-12-17 12:41 am (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] rm.livejournal.com
    I'm light-sensitive, but also night-blind (although, OMG, this is finally improving -- this is a celiac thing), so I tend to like lenses that aren't very dark anyway, but a very good point. I also worry about the transitions lenses going dark or not transitioning quickly in less-bright indoor environments.

    Re: sunglasses

    From: [identity profile] feyandstrange.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-17 12:55 am (UTC) - Expand

    Re: sunglasses

    From: [identity profile] 00goddess.livejournal.com - Date: 2009-12-21 09:19 pm (UTC) - Expand

    Date: 2009-12-17 01:01 am (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] better-late24.livejournal.com
    Okay, so who exactly on the flist is going to Gallifrey One this year? I've actually lost track. Why do I need to know? Inappropriate trinket planning, of course.

    I'll be there. I'm sucking it up and flying by myself. This is big news.

    Date: 2009-12-17 01:25 am (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] woogledesigns.livejournal.com
    They are not advocating discrimination or prejudice, nor are they stating that gay people are different from non-gay people in a way that should disadvantage them. They are asking a question, accepting that it is disturbing and giving a clear explanation of why they are asking it. It is quite explicit that they are asking the question to confront a vital issue and not to incite hatred, so it is not necessarily hate speech under UK law.

    Should gay people be executed? Of course not. But a whole bunch of people think unequivocally that they should. So how is ignoring that question going to convince them otherwise?

    Date: 2009-12-17 02:07 am (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] neadods.livejournal.com
    I don't know about Gallifrey. I keep being jealous of people talking about it at ChicagoTARDIS, so I wonder if I should get to it this year. Then I remember that 2010 is supposed to be the "low con" year to deal with financial issues, and change my mind again.

    ETA: I have only the one pair, but I love my transition lenses like pie. I have goggles that drop over everything for driving.
    Edited Date: 2009-12-17 02:08 am (UTC)

    Date: 2009-12-17 07:25 am (UTC)
    From: [identity profile] sahiya.livejournal.com
    I'll be there! And [livejournal.com profile] antennapedia, too (who was at WriterCon, though I'm not sure you actually met - she remembers your panel on fight scenes with great fondness, however).

    February 2021

    S M T W T F S
     123456
    789 10111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28      

    Most Popular Tags

    Style Credit

    Expand Cut Tags

    No cut tags
    Page generated Apr. 29th, 2026 09:08 pm
    Powered by Dreamwidth Studios