The New York Times has a brief article on skin-lightening creams, which strikes me as one of those things that once again the New York Times is the last to find out about.
On women, literature and recognition. Can I note I find all this stuff very tiring? I have enough gender issues without worrying if I'm just trying to circumvent the bullshit; it may be one reason (the other is that it was _made_ for print) that I've so held onto my name. It's true in theater too. Do I think a full-length Dogboy & Justine would get a better reception if it was seen as a man's statement about men instead of a woman's statement about women? Yeah, I do.
Villains and saints: or Elizabeth Edwards as the latest example of how women with public images never get to be simply human. And, of course, the New York Times places this in the Fashion & Style section.
Have you been following the Prop 8 trial online? I've been using The Advocate's Twitter feed. Anyway, the whole thing is sort of riveting and awful. The judge seems deeply irritated by the pro-Prop 8 lawyers, and sometimes seems to ask them questions just to see what nonsensical shit they'll say next. The Prop 8 Trial Tracker is also your friend, and tekalynn points us to this part of the transcript to remind us of the weight and misery of the closet. And, as tekalynn notes, read the comments.
I am so glad someone is finally mentioning that not everyone can see 3D. I can, but it's uneven for me sometimes and I don't like it. Patty can't. The possible future move to 3D TV, which I hate for other reasons (goggles isolate you from the communal experience of home viewing/discussing in real time with others) will completely screw up TV for a lot of people and it makes me unhappy.
Vid rec: Afraid of Americans. It's a fest vid, so we don't know who made it yet. Watchmen fandom. Well-done and smart.
Have _finally_ ordered the rank slides for the coat.
Current Music:Abney Park - The Wrong Side (Vernian Processed Mix)
On 3D - yeah if you don't have good depth perception to begin with, 3D is either a complete fail or very frustrating. For most of my life I couldn't understand three dimensional renderings in two dimensional space. Turned out I had no depth perception. Only one eye was working for distance. The brain had 'turned off' the signal from the other eye otherwise I would have had double vision.
Had it fixed surgically. Have fighter pilot depth perception now. Only problem - I developed a bit of vertigo (cause everything is sooo deep when you look down). For a year after surgery I couldn't walk down a flight of stairs without getting dizzy.
I think I'll be skipping the 3D experience - its too much like those early days of discovering depth perception, disconcerting and not very pleasant.
no subject
Date: 2010-01-17 07:49 am (UTC)Had it fixed surgically. Have fighter pilot depth perception now. Only problem - I developed a bit of vertigo (cause everything is sooo deep when you look down). For a year after surgery I couldn't walk down a flight of stairs without getting dizzy.
I think I'll be skipping the 3D experience - its too much like those early days of discovering depth perception, disconcerting and not very pleasant.