According to court documents (pdf), a 15-year-old Harvard-Westlake High School Student created a Web site in 2005 to promote his singing and acting career. When fellow students discovered the site, they were reportedly "offended and put off by its ‘I am better than you’ attitude and its blatant bragging and self promotion."
Several of the students began posting threatening remarks such as “Faggot, I’m going to kill you,” and "If I ever see you I‘m . . . going to pound your head in with an ice pick."
I'm going to refrain from drawing parallels to adventures I've had as an adult with other, mindbogglingly, other adults on the Internet, mainly because it's so obvious, I don't need to.
1. They're doing experiments on demons and they don't know about the Slayer?
2. Where's the funding coming from?
3. There weren't that many built guys on my college campus, what is up with that?
4. So are these really college guys that have been recruited to be agents... or what?
5. Jesus, X-files much?
Meanwhile, I was all "rapetastic episode #973" and then it was "oh, Spike's the angry impotent rapist!" and then it was "god help me, this is sort of hilarious" and I still can't decide if Wheedon is very, very savvy about his issues as a writer or if he's very, very oblivious to them.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 01:53 pm (UTC)Dunno if anyone's mentioned this, but episode 7 on BtVS is always a big one that deals with all the themes etc and pushes the story forward.
And your questions...
*clears throat, and says in best Doctor-voice*: "I'll explain later."
No really, it'll all be explained. Well except #3, which I'll put down to TV reality.
Meanwhile, I was all "rapetastic episode #973" and then it was "oh, spikes the angry impotent rapist!" and then it was "god help me, this is sort of hilarious" and I still can't decide if Wheedon is very, very savvy about his issues as a writer or if he's very, very oblivious to them.
That's a beautiful summary. People *still* argue about that scene. :)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 01:57 pm (UTC)I don't know where you went to school, but my University, SUNY Albany, had a huge sports program, and there were many built guys (and very big ones) on campus, who played for the various teams. Football and baseball especially. Some of those guys were very large.
(and pretty. Very, very pretty.)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 09:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 03:01 pm (UTC)With that said, I'd totally stump for Rachel and her big dog if she decided to run here in MA.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 03:20 pm (UTC)What is trhe court actually going to DO about her violated rights then? It seems very... empty
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 03:36 pm (UTC)Yeah, I was really disappointed. I'd vote for her.
OTOH, if she leaves to go to the Senate, would anybody step up to do her job? That would be a tragic loss.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 03:57 pm (UTC)Both, I think. Which I find endlessly interesting.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 04:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 06:10 pm (UTC)Grants: are you aware of this?
N'aww, phones.
I am not at all sure how I feel about that ruling in the prom case yet, but I think the precedent is...interesting. I'll want to think this one through. It's good because it shores up students' civil rights, but I think a lot of school districts are going to feel empowered to take their bats and balls and sulk off home (or encourage private parties in lieu of school-sponsored ones) in the future, which doesn't exactly help, and may increase a bullying risk.
And I'm in favor of the cyberbullying case because, dude. Threats? Not okay. Not. Okay. NOT OKAY! Who doesn't understand this?! ARGH.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 09:33 pm (UTC)This is an issue that keeps on coming up on Whedon's work, most recently with Dollhouse (which I personally think is really clever and subversive -- though I have yet to finish S2 -- but many disagree with that). I think that Whedon is generally very savvy, but he still has the occasional moment of dire fail that just makes me go "BUH?"
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 11:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 11:53 pm (UTC)Of course there are individual moments of fail on the show, where it fails to live up to its potential, or where the fail comes from somewhere else entirely (misrepresenting certain professions, etc), but overall I think it's really well done (up until episode 6 of S2, anyway -- I haven't watched past that yet :P).
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 11:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 07:22 am (UTC)I think another problem some people have/had with it is that we're really forced, even from the beginning, a lot of the focus was on the people who ran the Dollhouse. Personally, I liked that aspect and how it was handled.
The Initiative:
Date: 2010-03-25 01:56 am (UTC)2. If I keep going with this list, I really will spoil it for you. So I'll suggest that you follow Patty's advice. :-)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 03:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 09:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 03:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 07:13 am (UTC)Heh, I love that, because with all the similarities I see between Torchwood and Angel (and really, they only grow as the show continues, in my opinion), I've tried to think about the parallels between the characters. I tentatively lean towards Cordelia being Ianto.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 11:33 am (UTC)