According to court documents (pdf), a 15-year-old Harvard-Westlake High School Student created a Web site in 2005 to promote his singing and acting career. When fellow students discovered the site, they were reportedly "offended and put off by its ‘I am better than you’ attitude and its blatant bragging and self promotion."
Several of the students began posting threatening remarks such as “Faggot, I’m going to kill you,” and "If I ever see you I‘m . . . going to pound your head in with an ice pick."
I'm going to refrain from drawing parallels to adventures I've had as an adult with other, mindbogglingly, other adults on the Internet, mainly because it's so obvious, I don't need to.
1. They're doing experiments on demons and they don't know about the Slayer?
2. Where's the funding coming from?
3. There weren't that many built guys on my college campus, what is up with that?
4. So are these really college guys that have been recruited to be agents... or what?
5. Jesus, X-files much?
Meanwhile, I was all "rapetastic episode #973" and then it was "oh, Spike's the angry impotent rapist!" and then it was "god help me, this is sort of hilarious" and I still can't decide if Wheedon is very, very savvy about his issues as a writer or if he's very, very oblivious to them.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 06:10 pm (UTC)Grants: are you aware of this?
N'aww, phones.
I am not at all sure how I feel about that ruling in the prom case yet, but I think the precedent is...interesting. I'll want to think this one through. It's good because it shores up students' civil rights, but I think a lot of school districts are going to feel empowered to take their bats and balls and sulk off home (or encourage private parties in lieu of school-sponsored ones) in the future, which doesn't exactly help, and may increase a bullying risk.
And I'm in favor of the cyberbullying case because, dude. Threats? Not okay. Not. Okay. NOT OKAY! Who doesn't understand this?! ARGH.