I know it's super easy to go to Cardiff for a day. Patty and I did it last month. What's not super easy is leaving New York on July 7, landing in London on July 8, going to Cardiff on July 9, heading to Bristol that night, heading back to London on July 11, leaving for New York on July 12. See how much better this plan is if Cardiff just gets removed? SO MUCH BETTER. But I'm still torn because of the nature of my research and my desire for fabulous gluten-free welsh cakes. Also, the part where I am whiny.
On the other hand, after reading an article about how awfully hard it is to manage to use points on Delta, I'm a bit more "fuck it" and leaning towards Virgin Atlantic. Did you know, however, that you can't trade frequent flier points between Virgin Atlantic and Virgin America? Also, the most ideal times for the flights to allow me to actually do stuff in London on Monday involve me flying back into Newark. Getting home from Newark sucks, but a little bit of inconvenience is worth it, right?
Also, what do I want to see in my brief stays in London this time? Imperial War Museum. But what else? What do I want to see in my super brief sojourn in Bristol? Cardiff is the WORST possible plan, right? The question is whether not going to Cardiff is an even more terrible plan.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-20 10:27 pm (UTC)It wasn't intended to start an argument at all (though I'm happy to engage anyone who wishes to contest a square with me; and actually, I did edit in an explanation of my choices when I became aware people were linking this in order to provide a better context). And as it happens, I do tell people directly, frequently. This bingo square isn't about that first step of telling people, it's about that next step, when someone has been told, and isn't buying it, and comes back with all the highlighted arguments - which went into the squares because I've heard them often enough to consider them cliches. I didn't invent a single one. In fact, I was moved to make the square because I've been participating in and seeing this kind of conversation so often that I've long since stopped hearing any original or unrefutable counter-arguments. As well as allowing me to collect my own thoughts, I hoped it might be useful to others who are less familiar or confident with this issue - certainly I've found similar cards to be useful in helping me recognise and refute common derailing techniques.
You do seem to be proceeding from the assumption this bingo card is the pinnacle of all engagement in this conversation, either for me personally, or for the wider fandom, but it isn't; it's intended as a meta-comment on a wider discourse, not the entire discourse itself - and it's not intended to be an argument in itself, but a comment on one.
I grant also there's an element of expressed frustration and humour there, and I won't even try and deny it could be construed as passive-aggressive if someone's been presenting the kind of argument that's likely to lead them to take it personally - but, honestly, this is a deeply personal issue for me, and others, and if you're going to argue we are never ever allowed to be the ones who are snarky, even among ourselves, when we're the ones who stand to be hurt by this issue, then basically what you're making is a tone argument. If I don't happen to want to be patiently teaching people who ought to be perfectly capable of teaching themselves today, then I'm not actually obliged to.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-21 01:27 am (UTC)