PSA: Queer

Jun. 18th, 2010 11:38 am
[personal profile] rm
(This is an outgrowth of a comment thread I'm having with someone in their journal. If that someone is you, no worries, we're cool).

Queer (as an adjective, we will not be using the noun here) is not inherently synonymous with gay and lesbian or LGBT.1

Many LGBT people do not like or choose to use queer and/or feel it to represent something additional or instead of gay and lesbian or LGBT.

Because queer was originally a slur and not all LGBT people like to use it,2 it's generally best that straight people don't use the word unless talking about people and groups that self-identify as queer.

Queer can be considered a non-assimilationist word. Some LGBT people who are not interested in getting equal rights by proving we're just like straight people prefer the term. (This is like when I rant about how "I'm queer and you can tell and I like it that way.")

Some non-trans people who are gender non-conforming use the term or variations there of (i.e., genderqueer).

Some trans people who are additionally not straight use the term as a shorthand way of encompassing multiple identities.

Some people who would traditionally be called "bisexual" use the term to avoid the reinforcement of a binary gender dichotomy.

Some people prefer queer because it removes the separation between men and women in the LGBT community, breaks down barriers between bisexual and other orientation identities, and can be more inclusive of the T part of the LGBT (which often gets pushed aside, because oppressed groups can be crappy to each other too).

Others like it because it's only one syllable.

Additionally queer is sometimes used to encompass kink, polyamorous and other non-traditional relationship styles in a way that may or may not be related to LGBT individuals depending on the community.3

As usual, I don't speak for all LGBT or queer people, just myself and my experience of our communities. If you have questions or more to add, consider the comments a free for all. I'm particularly interested in other people's sense and connotations for the word as ongoing discussion in the original thread is revealing that they are highly varied.




1 A commenter reminds me that LGBT is just not enough these days, nor is LGBTQ, which you'll also often see. The full acronym these days often includes not just LGBT, but Queer, Questioning, Intersex, Asexual and more.
2 It's also just been brought to my attention that age may be a factor in how one reacts to queer so this PSA might seem more or less peculiar to you depending on your age.
3 Please see comments for additional discussion of this as there is disagreement on this one. It is problematic for many, and I tend to agree, although the arguments for its inclusion in queer also make a lot of sense.

ETA: Please read the comments. This is such an awesome display of diverse identities, respectful discussion about fraught issues and random people making friends I can't quite get over it. I am loving the LJ today.

Date: 2010-06-18 05:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kindkit.livejournal.com
"Queer" in academia, in my experience (I worked on English Renaissance literature), isn't generally used to describe individual people's identities (except perhaps the academic's own, or those who explicitly self-identify as queer). It's much more common as a way of talking about the relationship of certain kinds of acts, orientations, and identities to a culturally-specified "normality." One driving force behind the use of "queer" is a discomfort with terms like "gay," "lesbian," and "bisexual" when referring to historical/cultural circumstances in which those identities were not actually available. (Talking about homosexuality in Shakespeare, for example, is a major historical problem, while talking about queerness in Shakespeare is much more viable, and doesn't necessarily just refer to same-sex desire. Personally, when I was doing academic writing and meant same-sex desire and nothing else, I used the term "homoeroticism" because it's more specific.)

In my experience, queer studies scholars tend to avoid labeling the identities of authors or characters. I can talk about the queerness (in terms of class, age, and same-sex-ness) of Antonio's love for Sebastian, but it's pointless to say that Antonio is gay or queer or whatever. It's equally pointless to say that of Shakeapeare himself--there's pervasive homoeroticism in his writing, but we don't know the relationship between his writing and his subjectivity, nor do we know who he had sex with or wanted to have sex with or what he felt about the whole business.

Maybe other academics are using "queer" in a more labeling way, but I haven't seen it. What I have seen happen, although it's much less common now than it was back in the 1970s and 1980s, is the ahistorical labeling of people as "homosexual," "bisexual," "gay," "lesbian," etc.
Edited Date: 2010-06-18 05:29 pm (UTC)

the ahistorical labeling of people

Date: 2010-06-18 08:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stardragonca.livejournal.com
Yes! Pet bee of mine!
Particularly 'Gay.' Gay was something you did, a decision you made, something you acted on.
Particularly, it was deciding not to be ashamed.
Gay meant out, to someone. It wasn't something you could be before it became a public thing, a social movement, a community, a culture.
That said, I'm not all that thrilled about labeling someone 'an homosexual' before that social category existed, either.
To me that's like calling Hiawatha "an early U.S. politician..."!

Re: the ahistorical labeling of people

Date: 2010-06-18 11:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kindkit.livejournal.com
Yeah, the term "homosexual" didn't even exist before about 1860, and didn't come into the English language for a bit after that. It does seem pretty clear that there were people before that who did form identities related to their sexual desires (e.g. the "molly" subculture of the 18th century) but "homosexual" is so tightly related to the 19th century medicalization of sexual categories that I don't think it's any more appropriate for earlier periods than "gay".

Date: 2010-06-18 09:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] usullusa.livejournal.com
This.
My limited experience with queer studies has been that people are rarely referred to as queer unless they self-identify as such. Queer is usually used to describe queer narratives or experiences, as in narratives that are not hetero or gender normative.

February 2021

S M T W T F S
 123456
789 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 27th, 2026 07:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios