![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
As a comic itself, I don't care that much, but I fully admit to not really having the receptor sites for this sort of thing. As dialogue though, it's AMAZING. I'm very curious to see how it's going to be received. I suspect messily. Anyway, props to all involved.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 09:11 pm (UTC)- Evil Ianto, who is alive, and with Jack
- Good Ianto, who is dead, and with Jack (CoE)
- Good Ianto, who is alive, but not with Jack
The comic's ending, though, implies that you can also have just one of the three:
- Good Ianto, who is dead, and not with Jack
- Evil Ianto, who is alive, and not with Jack (the comic)
- Evil Ianto, who is dead, and with Jack
I suppose you could also have all/nothing:
- Evil Ianto, who is dead, and not with Jack
- Good Ianto, who is alive, and is with Jack
It's like its own little prompt table.
("Evil" is, obv. shorthand, and not a proper judgment...)
no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 09:16 pm (UTC)(Give him a goatee, on the other hand, and the case is clearer.)
no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 09:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-22 09:24 pm (UTC)That could have been a spite shag. The enemy of one's enemy, after all. John Hart is an unreliable source! Oh sure, there's Rhys involved, and surely he's more reliable, but that's just an imposition of a particular value system kicking in.
She did sort of creep up on him in the car with a knife, though.
Evil = stubbornly seeking to prove the superiority of one's worldview or biases in spite of reality?