![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
On the one hand, sure, when you suddenly get thrust into the national spotlight for a tricky job interview, you get counseled on what to wear, how to sit, how to inflect -- all that stuff. I get it, because jeez, I used to work in PR, I used to be the one coaching people on stuff like that; and it's not like working in front of the camera from time to time doesn't make me perfectly aware of it as well.
But on the other hand, the fear of the queer is so strong in response to Kagan we've faced coverage in the Washington Post of her sitting habits, a bizarre ramble from Elliott Spitzer on his recollection that she dated men he knew in law school (which proves what, exactly? and why is anyone letting Elliott Spitzer talk about this?), and repeated assurances from the White House that she's heterosexual. Now she has a cute haircut, vibrant suits and enough makeup on that she looks like a different person.
Regardless of what Kagan's orientation may be, the public presentation of her by others have been strongly focused on two messages: 1. "There are no queers here." and 2. "This woman wants to please you." Regardless of how any of this may reflect on Kagan's identity regardless of sexual orientation and to what degree she has colluded in all this as an arguably necessary pragmatic act to ensure her confirmation, what's happening here is queer erasure, even if it is merely of a conceptual queer presence that may or may not exist in these circumstances, and it sends a completely horrible message to anyone paying attention about women, queer identities, intellect and public performance.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 02:10 pm (UTC)So agreed. I'd love to hear more about her capacities as a jurist, but the peanut-gallery of the media seems to be mostly interested in whether she's a 'real woman'.
I believe
no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 02:17 pm (UTC)That link to India's right to know... I hadn't heard about that, so thanks :D
HP Trailer - that's what it reminded me of... I watched it, thought it reminded me of something and then put it into words!
no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 02:33 pm (UTC)Wish we had that right-to-know law here in the US...maybe it would shorten the amount of paperwork and redtape in trying to get assistance.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 02:55 pm (UTC)I'm slightly stalled on kink_bingo at the moment. I began writing one and it turned into something else entirely.
mmm ...
Date: 2010-06-29 02:56 pm (UTC)*That is the responsibility and role of the U S Congress, unless any such laws are Un-Constitutional, it is then the duty and role of the Supreme Court to cite them as such, duh. And the Constitution has the ability to be changed, as well, by the process of Amendments.
For the record, this comment is off the cuff and as such, it is what it is. ';=p
no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 04:32 pm (UTC)I don't care whether she's gay. I do care about people carrying on about whether she is or not: I know that for some people sexual orientation is an identity (to use the dreadful and imprecise buzz-word du jour), but it isn't for everyone, and it troubles me to see what amounts to a demand that sexual orientation be made into a flag and waved about in situations like this. And it troubles me especially when the demand is made of women, precisely because of the millennia of cultural insistence that sexuality is and must be the most important thing about any woman.
Don't get me wrong here: I'd still much rather have seen Pam Karlan nominated for the spot. But I'm finding that I like Kagan better for her long history of having no private life anywhere the public could see it, and her refusal to drag one into the light now. And if the White House is following her lead on this rather than vice versa, I like them better for it too.
-- Oh, and the Spitzer thing? Is weird as hell, but it happened because of the demands from people like Andrew Sullivan for testimony beyond the administration's simple and not-terribly-publicized response that she's straight when asked about it early in the process. (Bizarrely, Sully started up with his table-pounding something like a week after the question had been asked and answered, and his table-pounding consisted, at least initially, of "Why won't the administration answer this burning question?") Kagan has friends, and reporters managed to reach some of them for comment, that's all.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 05:04 pm (UTC)I'm trying resist the urge to buy the TARDIS-like luggage they've got on sale right now.
Which one did you end up buying? I'm still strongly considering one of the blue-dotted ones and want to make sure we don't end up with the same dress.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 05:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 05:58 pm (UTC)Why is anyone letting Elliot Spitzer talk about anything these days, much less this?
I am in complete agreement about the erasure. It's depressing.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 06:55 pm (UTC)I hope you have a good day!
no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 07:57 pm (UTC)wondering if I really can map out a hardcore yet plotty, plotty Jack/Ianto BDSM fic that does something the other people who have gone there haven't done before
Do it! It'd be awesome! And you'd probably have better luck with it than I would. *is currently stalled on a kink_bingo fic*
no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 08:51 pm (UTC)As far as legal gay marriages and name changes: this is the natural result of same-sex marriage being legal in some states and not others and not sanctioned by federal law. This is why traditional marriages carry over from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, to avoid such problems. I'm sure there will be many such ramifications and there will be lots of lawsuits. Nothing is going to change until DOMA is repealed or declared unconstitutional.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 08:55 pm (UTC)Of course, you may not have eaten anything xanthan gum related and it was the 'natural flavorings' or cross-contamination as you pointed out. Anyway, I hope you feel better. There's really nothing worse on both you and your partner than the GI hell. My partner is even more vigilant than I am because it's a nightmare for both of us.
no subject
Date: 2010-06-29 09:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-30 10:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-06-30 02:37 pm (UTC)And I'm sorry you got so sick!
no subject
Date: 2010-06-30 04:28 pm (UTC)And I got the Sadie.