Page Summary
weirdquark - (no subject)
affreca.livejournal.com - Accessibility
firefly124.livejournal.com - (no subject)
laughingacademy.livejournal.com - (no subject)
askeladden.livejournal.com - (no subject)
wordsofastory.livejournal.com - (no subject)
azurelunatic - (no subject)
sunhawk.livejournal.com - (no subject)
stardragonca.livejournal.com - (no subject)
pantryslut.livejournal.com - (no subject)
robling-t.livejournal.com - (no subject)
http://users.livejournal.com/lindalee_/ - Facebook...
bodlon.livejournal.com - (no subject)
diachrony.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: by
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 03:42 pm (UTC)Seriously? Because I know several people who are not using their real name on Facebook, and are in fact using obvious pseudonyms. Though I can't be sure that they didn't register with their real names and are displaying the fake ones -- I don't remember how registration worked.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 03:52 pm (UTC)I'm one. After LeakyCon 2009*, I was persuaded to set up a FB under my online nick. I was never asked to supply my legal name, and as I mentioned below, the construction is actually quite similar. I have several bellydancer friends who have similarly set up their FB under their dance names, some more obviously pseudonymous than others.
*Date thrown in because Mr. Goingback's case started in 2008, so it's clear that whatever algorithm "caught" his name a) was already online and b) let mine slide right through.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 05:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 12:17 am (UTC)Case in point, observe my livejournal username, which is my first name.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 12:20 am (UTC)Accessibility
Date: 2010-07-04 03:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 03:46 pm (UTC)WTF?? I mean, they have never yet questioned my fandom-FB name, which started as Dancing Firefly and became Firefly Dancing when I discovered that what was showing up in people's feeds was "Dancing commented on this" or "Dancing liked that." And that name actually is fake, at least in the sense of "not registered legally anywhere," though it follows a similar construction.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 03:58 pm (UTC)I really hate that site. I'd log in and give my support to Owl, but - it would require logging in, and - bleargh.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 04:03 pm (UTC)Really? Facebook boggled at "Owl Goingback"? I have a friend who signed up as "Zeitgeist Fallow."
In re: apologies, did you see this article that
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 04:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 05:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 02:41 am (UTC)Now I wonder if I should get a blogger account just so I can follow Nathan's blog.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 04:20 pm (UTC)i have to wonder...
Date: 2010-07-04 04:35 pm (UTC)Re: i have to wonder...
Date: 2010-07-05 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 04:12 am (UTC)Of course, I'm really more of an Elvis Tallulah Poodle...
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 07:13 pm (UTC)I used to be against warnings, then I realized that in this community allowing people to have information that makes them feel safe before viewing my work means more people will see my work.
While I occasionally will "choose not to warn" because I can't think of what specific warning might be appropriate for a story that is rather unremittingly dark, "choose not to warn" while informative can be sort of annoying. It's like if I go into a restaurant and I say "I can't eat wheat, can you tell me if there's any used to thicken this soup" and they say "We won't tell you that" as opposed to "no, but there's a lot of wheat in our kitchen, so it may not be safe for you."
In the the fan community labeling the tin does not impinge on creative freedom (the way it does with the MPAA ratings system which is full of double-standards, misogynistic and biased against entertainment for adult audiences), and being totally against warnings is, in my own opinion, sort of an asshole move.
But, like I said, I didn't get it for a long damn time.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 07:44 pm (UTC)What I didn't understand was the perspective I saw that basically said "I don't want to use the 'i don't use warnings' label because it will create SOME sort of expectation, and I want people to watch my vids with NO EXPECTATIONS WHATSOEVER!" as if art is this precious, delicate thing that can only succeed through very strict presentation conditions and must be privileged over all other factors, including the risk for harm to the audience in question. I just wrote an overly-wordy blurb about it in my LJ, in fact LOL
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 07:18 pm (UTC)I remember when MSM people from "Out East" had trouble believing that a then prominent political activist(who was a bit of a lowlife, which is a completely unrelated matter) in Alberta's last name was Born with a tooth. Which it was. At least one such reported it as "known only as."
There are real people with real names like Mistaken Rider, and Starblanket(or Bridgewater and Acorn for that matter.) It's a big world, and what seems peculiar to you is not some sort of universal standard.
*fumes*
Unrelated P.S.:LJ notifications FUBAR.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 08:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-04 09:43 pm (UTC)Given that I had sufficiently current backups of everything important, I was... actually not too bad with the HD being so completely kaput that time it had to be replaced, 'cos at least I didn't have to worry about What They'd SEEN...
Facebook...
Date: 2010-07-04 10:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 04:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 04:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 04:53 am (UTC)Congratulations. All of the gears in my head just seized. Fucking hell.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 05:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 05:25 am (UTC)Which is to say, who's playing the role of surprirse Naoko Mori in 2011?
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 02:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-06 12:10 am (UTC)