sundries: media madness edition
Jul. 14th, 2010 09:48 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-community.gif)
That said, despite brief moments from female characters (many of them awesome series regulars who were just here to wave and say hi in this episode) I find the relentless all-male nature of this show aggravating. Just as an aggressively gender dichotomous world is uncomfortable for me to live in, a single-gendered world is unpleasant for me to watch.
And I find it puzzling that I have that reaction so strongly to this show where the masculinity, while constant is hardly overbearing or traditional (Neal's shape is the masculine version of the hourglass; Peter loves his wife; no one would normally want to grow up to be a nebbish like Mozzie, but Mozzie is so cool), but that said there were points last night where I felt like we were seeing that "hints of softness in men, good! The actual presence of women, tedious necessity!"
I haven't really had this problem with the show in the past (thanks to my deep love of June and El), and I'm hoping this was a single episode aberration.
The show, of course, remains firmly about love, and I'm deeply interested in the construction of the world that has the ability to trust being Neal's salvation and, perhaps, Peter's downfall.
More than that though, I have to say I still don't quite trust Peter. I think, now that we're in the second season of this, it would be cheap to find out that Peter is some criminal mastermind who wants Neal and the music box for his own nefarious purposes, but the show continues to structure itself so that rationally you must doubt periodically, and are then thrust into Neal's position -- do you invest and trust or do you walk away?
Ultimately, I'm not one for mysteries. I didn't care about the Kate plotline, and I don't care who killed her. I do care how people cope in the face of it, but I could do without all this chasing after the music box, to be frank.
And since I was mentioning it to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2010-07-15 07:04 am (UTC)Enough on that, yes, the show needs more female power. And turning Diana into a villain isn't helping anything. And it is incredibly sad that they never want to put Diana and Cruz in the same episode, since I can imagine them being an awesome team together. I'm personally hoping for more of Alex.
Covert Affairs...I actually liked it. Though, like you, I mostly liked it for the blind guy. All the scenes with them together were pure gold. I mean, I'm wondering just how blind he is, considering he could see her heels. Maybe it's some sort of elaborate cover. Even if it isn't, I loved that scene with them sneaking into the medical examiner's morgue and calling the FBI questioning him sight-ist was brilliant. His whole conversation with the guys questioning him was memorable. Admittedly I didn't care much for the Matt Damon Bourne Identity movies (though the original Robert Urich ones are pretty good), and Covert Affairs has the same pace, and not much threadable story. I think I'm with the others though, swearing to watch it mainly for the blind guy.