One of the things that doesn't help is everyone else visiting is sort of feeling it too, so no one leaves anyone alone. So I feel both isolated and like I have no space. And I don't feel relieved when people offer to walk with me at night. I just feel like I'm not getting what I need.
One of the things that doesn't help is everyone else visiting is sort of feeling it too, so no one leaves anyone alone. So I feel both isolated and like I have no space. And I don't feel relieved when people offer to walk with me at night. I just feel like I'm not getting what I need.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 06:09 pm (UTC)WHAT? Jesus.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 06:19 pm (UTC)Lawrence protects the right to intimate association, and a state cannot impede that right, which is what they're doing if they criminalize you for your status as a married gay person.
Even if the right isn't declared fundamental (which marriage is well documented to be, though there is debate over whether same-sex marriage is), the state runs into problems trying to get around Romer, which states that laws based purely on animus towards a group cannot be upheld. Not knowing anything about this law, but guessing that the congressional intent runs somewhere along the lines of "ewww gay people are gross/immoral/etc," and without any other reason, much less a semi-valid one, the law is based purely on animus and therefore will go down.
As awful as it sounds, and as horrible as it would be to actually be prosecuted under this law, I don't think it passes constitutional muster.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 06:23 pm (UTC)In the meantime, we fight like hell to change it before it comes to prosecutions and lawsuits.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 08:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 06:11 pm (UTC)I do find the rats either charming or a source of wry admiration at how they manage to get by.
BRB reading that change.org article about gay marriage (I knew DOMA was a Bad Wrong Thing, but looks like there's even more to the legal mess than I knew...).
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 06:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 09:22 pm (UTC)As I understand it, drug testing can distinguish exogenous testosterone from body-produced testosterone (I don't know what it's called), which makes it complicated for trans men to play on men's teams at a high level. (You're not allowed exogenous testosterone, even if you have a comparable level to the average man.) This was one reason Balian Buschbaum gave for retiring when he came out.
That said, I'm a bit confused as non-trans women have played for Division I NCAA football teams, so using ID to determine gender seems a bit weird, but perhaps the issue is that there is no NCAA women's football. (I've heard of other trans college athletes, but in sports that aren't NCAA-sanctioned.)
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 10:02 pm (UTC)When women play on men's teams, or men play on women's teams, the NCAA classifies those teams as "mixed." Mixed teams are eligible to compete in NCAA men's championships, but mixed teams are NOT eligible to compete in NCAA women's championships. I don't know why that's the rule, but I'm assuming that it's the reason why the NCAA goes by the gender listed on someone's state ID.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 11:10 pm (UTC)I assume the NCAA doesn't actually know what it takes to change your ID. Regardless of whether it's a suitable proxy for gender, the rules vary with state and citizenship, so it's hardly a uniform standard for all competitors.
*I really know nothing about running, that's just a piece of trivia I had. There could be some reason why there's no parity in mile times and that parity will be achieved at some point in the future or men may always run faster miles.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 01:17 am (UTC)(Funny enough, track is my sport. I'd love to see a woman break the four minute mile).
no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 03:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 06:41 pm (UTC)Are the other 10% just not looking at the ground?
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 06:46 pm (UTC)Apparently in some states you can register to vote on the spot, so if you're in the US and not registered to vote, it's worth checking to see if you live in such a state.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 07:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 07:28 pm (UTC)[Also, because I don't want to make another comment just to say this: WTF, Wisconsin?]
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 09:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 07:05 pm (UTC)In other news, water has been discovered to be wet.
I mean, seriously?
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 07:17 pm (UTC)I think the rats are kind of cute! They are also fun to watch as they scurry around on ratly business.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 01:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 09:22 pm (UTC)(^---is really a bird person, so doesn't distinguish strongly between furry things)
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 07:26 pm (UTC)And I haven't changed a bit, I always look for critters - rats and mice - on the tube now when I'm there, and very often see them. They are completely charming.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 08:01 pm (UTC)Is more ashamed than usual to be in Dairyland.
Adds this crappola to the 'fighting list'...
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 08:27 pm (UTC)Most of the rest of the country doesn't do well either (I'm in California, and I'm from Virginia - neither are god's gift to civil rights in this respect. Or any other, really.).
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 08:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 12:23 am (UTC)Perfect.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-02 10:40 pm (UTC)I don't know about rats, but I see mice in the underground El stations on a pretty regular basis. They're cute and well fed, and not in my home, so I never mind them. I've seen people shriek about them though.
no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 01:48 am (UTC)Re: rats
Date: 2010-11-03 02:51 am (UTC)I vote for the NYC subway rat as our new mascot. I mean, recognition-wise, their main competition is the bedbug, and no one wants THAT, right?
no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 04:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-11-04 02:40 pm (UTC)Also, Ezio and Altaïr approve of you being charmed by the rats.