Changing your Facebook or Twitter icon or participating in a meme is not activism. It can, however, a way to draw attention to an issue. But if you do nothing with that attention, it's wasted. Changing your icon and then posting a status message saying "I changed my icon to support children who are abused" doesn't tell me anything. Include a link to an organization that I can give me time or dollars to. Don't know one? That's okay! Ask people for one in that status message update. All it takes is an extra three seconds to make a potentially meaningless gesture into a potentially meaningful one, just by asking for people who may be more up on the issue to tell you about resources they know about.
Also "repost this if you support gay rights" stuff? Especially stuff that's sort of bullying and implies if you don't repost it you don't support gay rights or whatever the issue is? Fucking obnoxious. My journal, my words, my life. Those memes are honestly upsetting.
And then there are the innuendo-y memes (there's been a few of these to raise breast cancer lately) about "where do you like it," are also annoying. Because they don't connect to the issue, and if the only way we care about women's health is by making innuendos about fucking, we have a problem.
I am not saying don't do memes. Sometimes I change my Twitter icon for stuff too! I am not saying symbolism isn't important -- see: the AIDS ribbon. I am not saying my issues have to be your issues -- we all have different priorities and that's okay too. But I am saying that these gestures without context are the waste of a good opportunity; that only clicking the "like" button doesn't doesn't save lives; that the Internet is a powerful tool for high-impact activism through the accumulation of relatively low-impact gestures in you add a little bit of strategy to the mix.
$$, time, personal testimony, outreach to those in need, political contact are how change happens. Visibility is a tool that makes those things happen. But people aren't mind readers, and if they aren't already energized about your issue, they aren't going to go seeking shit out on their own. They need to be activated, and your innuendo, your snazzy new icon, your "say this or you suck" isn't going to do the job without just a little bit more.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-06 08:28 pm (UTC)I have been trying to understand why I find them so upsetting, and this statement resonates with me. I was mildly upset by feeling bullied when the cartoon meme was still about "we want to see no human faces on Facebook!" because, um, why not? You know what I like about user icons? They tell me who is posting when I'm scanning through posts and comments. I like seeing my friends' faces. What do people have against faces? Screw you for telling me my face is harshing your squee. Etc. etc.
Then the ones that turn into "do this for [cause]" just send me through the roof. These two posts got at reasons why very effectively:
http://skepchick.org/blog/2010/12/its-never-been-easier-to-make-a-difference/
http://techyum.com/2010/12/making-child-abuse-facebook-famous/ (good stuff is at the end)
But my own reaction to being told "do this" is really disproportionate. My whole first week of training for my new online teaching gig was consumed with rage over being told stuff like "Introduce yourself." "Respond to two other students' posts." "Describe how _____ University's training will help you to address _____ in your teaching." "Write a journal entry about what you are learning from this process." Something about being forced to fake being a "joiner" is really hard going for me in the last few years - I was actually glad I had a pinched nerve in my back during the last "faculty retreat" I attended at my previous job, because it got me out of doing group yoga.
no subject
Date: 2010-12-06 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-12-07 12:03 am (UTC)