Lots of fantastic stuff in the Times today, but _fantastic_ article about Karl Lagerfeld (who's been slowly creeping up my list of personal heroes for a while now -- if you read this piece the reasons are stunningly obvious). Just reading about his schedule makes me a) tired and b) want to work about twenty times harder than I do.
But really, it's a gorgeous piece, mainly for how both its author and Lagerfeld seem to understand that most of a story exists in the spaces between details.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/20/style/tmagazine/TW141315L.htmlA final German story: this from 1948, the year the mark was put back on the international scale, causing massive devaluation.
''It was summer,'' Lagerfeld said. ''My father came home and he got out of his car. He looked very pale. I said to my mother, 'Is he sick?'
And she said, 'If I took away your savings, you wouldn't look the same.' He had lost 90 percent of his fortune that day. My mother said, 'Go and change your money, you will see how little you will get.' So, I took what I had in my little savings box to the bank and changed it for new money. And with the money, you know what I did? I went to see a movie. I was the only person in the movie house because nobody had any money. It was an English movie with Margaret Lockwood. Don't ask me any other details.'' He laughed. ''Who remembers Margaret Lockwood?''
''Yes, who remembers?'' I said.
''Me.''
Seperately, I feel smugly ahead of the fashion curve yet again:
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2005/02/17/style/tmagazine/20clash_slide1.jpg although let me state for the record that if I would ever wear those boots (unlikely) I would definitely never wear them with that.