Nov. 18th, 2010
every word of this
Nov. 18th, 2010 02:05 pmMore about the TSA mess: http://elusis.livejournal.com/2141915.html
(suggestion to opt out isn't, as previously discussed, workable for everyone, but the analysis of the problems and the reasons why you should if you can is smart stuff)
(suggestion to opt out isn't, as previously discussed, workable for everyone, but the analysis of the problems and the reasons why you should if you can is smart stuff)
[Error: unknown template qotd]
ETA: See the question that box asks now? That's not what it used to say. The original question asked which Harry Potter character would you submit to a pat down and why if you were TSA for Hogwarts.
What LJ was thinking: two hot topics get exponentially hotter together.
What LJ actually did: trivialized a significant political and individual rights issue in the US and effectively asked people what fictional characters they'd like to sexually assault.
Sexual assualt: not hot or funny.
The erosion of personal freedom and the application of a whole lot of -isms in the name of security theater: also not hot or funny.
*sigh*
ETA: See the question that box asks now? That's not what it used to say. The original question asked which Harry Potter character would you submit to a pat down and why if you were TSA for Hogwarts.
What LJ was thinking: two hot topics get exponentially hotter together.
What LJ actually did: trivialized a significant political and individual rights issue in the US and effectively asked people what fictional characters they'd like to sexually assault.
Sexual assualt: not hot or funny.
The erosion of personal freedom and the application of a whole lot of -isms in the name of security theater: also not hot or funny.
*sigh*