creative stuff on my radar
Aug. 14th, 2004 10:57 amTrailer for Closer: http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/closer/video/closer_trailer_high.asx
This is like the movie I don't want to be excited about or interested in, on any level. Because first, it's the sort of thing that could, and maybe even should, suck, and won't because it's Mike Nichols and a good cast. So smarter, and more stylish than it deserves to be right off the bat. Secondly, every time I've seen the trailer, aside from being blown away by a couple of lines in it, I flash back very strongly to a conversation Michael and I once had in a sushi bar, about how much love he had to go around but not in any unfucked up poly sense of the word. But in a, he was incompetant and I should accept that with all my love and generosity because he was like Bill fucking Clinton. As the film says, if you believe in love at first sight, you never stop looking. See the little twist of my lips right now? Yeah. My lot in life may be many things, but it's not to be patient with the really crass and boring foibles of other people. Sexual fidelity doesn't hold much fascination for me other than as a creative device, but how people express their need for change, how they treat the things they are weary of, and the degree to which they can see a value in something even if it doesn't have a specific value for them -- these are measures of good grace and respect, and that's surely something I wish I had known sooner.
Anyway... Meanwhile... Mists of Avalon -- I'm on page 160, and I don't remember hating Every. Single. Character. from the first time I read it. Igraine is a hateful, shallow representation of everything I never wish to be. Vivaine is a hubristic nut. Morgaine is too desperate for obedience to anything. Morgause is the most boring Slytherin alive, and Lancelet needs a good smack (and I had forgotten that business with his real name being Galahad in this book, which isn't just confusing, but makes for some interesting analysis when compared with more traditional versions of the myth). Anyway... aaaaaargh! Lots of interesting stuff though about appearance and how it correlates to happens to people in the end (and not the obvious thing about Morgaine being small and dark, it's something weirder I've noticed)... I don't want to go on in more detail about it until I've finished it, on the odd chance I'm not remembering something right, but dear me, this book is screwy.
Is there any movie out this weekend I want to see? No. Grrr. Should see I, Robot and The Village, but it's hard to care.
This is like the movie I don't want to be excited about or interested in, on any level. Because first, it's the sort of thing that could, and maybe even should, suck, and won't because it's Mike Nichols and a good cast. So smarter, and more stylish than it deserves to be right off the bat. Secondly, every time I've seen the trailer, aside from being blown away by a couple of lines in it, I flash back very strongly to a conversation Michael and I once had in a sushi bar, about how much love he had to go around but not in any unfucked up poly sense of the word. But in a, he was incompetant and I should accept that with all my love and generosity because he was like Bill fucking Clinton. As the film says, if you believe in love at first sight, you never stop looking. See the little twist of my lips right now? Yeah. My lot in life may be many things, but it's not to be patient with the really crass and boring foibles of other people. Sexual fidelity doesn't hold much fascination for me other than as a creative device, but how people express their need for change, how they treat the things they are weary of, and the degree to which they can see a value in something even if it doesn't have a specific value for them -- these are measures of good grace and respect, and that's surely something I wish I had known sooner.
Anyway... Meanwhile... Mists of Avalon -- I'm on page 160, and I don't remember hating Every. Single. Character. from the first time I read it. Igraine is a hateful, shallow representation of everything I never wish to be. Vivaine is a hubristic nut. Morgaine is too desperate for obedience to anything. Morgause is the most boring Slytherin alive, and Lancelet needs a good smack (and I had forgotten that business with his real name being Galahad in this book, which isn't just confusing, but makes for some interesting analysis when compared with more traditional versions of the myth). Anyway... aaaaaargh! Lots of interesting stuff though about appearance and how it correlates to happens to people in the end (and not the obvious thing about Morgaine being small and dark, it's something weirder I've noticed)... I don't want to go on in more detail about it until I've finished it, on the odd chance I'm not remembering something right, but dear me, this book is screwy.
Is there any movie out this weekend I want to see? No. Grrr. Should see I, Robot and The Village, but it's hard to care.
No movies to see!
Date: 2004-08-14 09:26 am (UTC)Garden State- looks incredible, plus I find Zach Braff fascinating.
Intimate Strangers- French film about a woman who mistakingly sits down and tells her story to an accountant who she believed was a therapist.
Open Water- looks creepy and wonderfully suspenseful.
I've heard really good things about Maria Full of Grace, which apparently is less depressing and more empowering and uplifting than my impression from the preview.
Zatoichi: The Blind Swordsman- come on, who doesn't want to watch Zatoichi kick ass with big swords?
And I still haven't seen The Village which is interesting to me for the very polar reviews it is getting. Most of the critics I trust say it is complete crap, but a few have named it among the best of the year. And Collateral is interesting because I hadn't realized it wasn't much of an action film but is mostly a conversation in a cab. Plus Cruise is playing against type as a villain.
But I will probably see Twilight Samurai today since it is at the dollar theater and that allows for at least one other film or maybe two this weekend.
Re: No movies to see!
Date: 2004-08-14 10:30 am (UTC)I don't want to see Open Water at all. 1. It looks very creepy in a way I don't like. 2. I know way too much about an incident on which it was based. 3. Great movie idea, but *shudder*
I expect to loathe The Village and want to go entirely for the insideout dog factor, the pretty, and the fact that everyone tells me the score rocks.