(no subject)
Nov. 29th, 2006 11:59 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
rmHey, the government is now trying to do abstinence-only education for everyone that's unmarried and under-30. I guess they weither don't believe in unmarried 34-year-olds, have given up on us, or have decided my eggs arent' fresh enough for it to matter.
What the hell am I talking about?
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474976849618
for links to two articles about it (thank you![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
telesilla) and an opportunity to have an annoying argument with someone on the Internet.
er, woo.
What the hell am I talking about?
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474976849618
for links to two articles about it (thank you
telesilla) and an opportunity to have an annoying argument with someone on the Internet.er, woo.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-11-29 05:35 pm (UTC)I will give the administration credit for following through on their ideological targets. If they're going to teach children that the only safe method of birth control is giving up your groin to jesus it doesn't follow that upon reaching 18 years that a condom suddenly becomes a perfectly safe and effective method of birth control and protection from horrible diseases.
Why should kids get to have all the fun of sticking their head in the sand?