where I stand now
May. 31st, 2007 03:49 pmMany of you know I was seriously unhappy with LJ's first apology. Their most recent news post indicates how vast a restoration of accounts they are doing, and I have to say, I'm a lot happier.
BUT, Six Apart/LJ still has a lot to do to make me calm down. These things include:
a) making things right with users who have been branded pedophiles across the Internet (free journal rename tokens and public apology listing all wronged journals at minimum).
b) retraction of the CEOs statements claiming the right and ability to evaluate of what is art and academic study.
c) restorion of
lolita07. Thank you!
d) answering questions about where gay users stand in light of the continued phrasing about banning journals that encourage illegal sexual activity.
e) an admission that they outright lied to users at the beginning saying this wasn't going on.
f) a better explanation of why this happened how and when.
BUT, Six Apart/LJ still has a lot to do to make me calm down. These things include:
a) making things right with users who have been branded pedophiles across the Internet (free journal rename tokens and public apology listing all wronged journals at minimum).
b) retraction of the CEOs statements claiming the right and ability to evaluate of what is art and academic study.
d) answering questions about where gay users stand in light of the continued phrasing about banning journals that encourage illegal sexual activity.
e) an admission that they outright lied to users at the beginning saying this wasn't going on.
f) a better explanation of why this happened how and when.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 08:11 pm (UTC)I am also really unhappy with the amount of time I'm having to spend talking to people who think fic with underage characters in sexual situations promotes the rape of children. (I realize I can't actually blame Six Apart for this, but I feel they should do something to make up for it anyway.) And I do this not from the perspective from a fannish person but from the perspective of someone who is very dedicated to child protection issues and has therefore taken the time to learn what only looks like a problem and what really is a problem.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 08:41 pm (UTC)In short, the blame goes to lj for introducing ads and also to every last user who has an ad-supported account. Accepting advertising means that lj gave way some of its autonomy. The best way to stop this from happening again is to try to get people to stop using ad-supported accounts.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 08:41 pm (UTC)I am still so unspeakably upset and uncomfortable with all of this. And, from the comments in the
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 09:56 pm (UTC)People have been pointing that out all over the place, but still nothing.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-31 10:36 pm (UTC)I told the news post that I would let the Innocence idiots know about this fact if they don't remove his journals at once. You know, in the interest of maintaining their policy. :PPPPPPPP
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 05:45 am (UTC)AND NOW THEY'RE HARRASSING RAPE VICTIMS??????
This was just unbelievably triggering and awful and I don't even know if my response is proportionate or what.
no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 05:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-06-01 05:53 am (UTC)Fucking ads.