fame, at last!
Sep. 19th, 2007 09:18 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
http://www.overheardinnewyork.com/archives/011747.html
Yes, dahlinks, "chick on cell" was me. I assume it won't make anyone feel any better that the reference wasn't on my own behalf?
Yes, dahlinks, "chick on cell" was me. I assume it won't make anyone feel any better that the reference wasn't on my own behalf?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 01:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 01:32 pm (UTC)...and perhaps a little worrisome... :D :D :D
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 01:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 01:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 01:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 01:51 pm (UTC)Fortunately, he forgave me...
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 02:07 pm (UTC)Well, if it's any consolation, I'm sure your quote has amused legions of Voldeslashers today, tho. :)
Or would that be "He-Who-Must-Not-Be Slashed"? :D
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 02:09 pm (UTC)Anyway.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 04:05 pm (UTC)I like your description below though, about projecting on to people what they could be as a way to express something you want for yourself.
I used to work things out by talking about Star Trek: Voyager in public with my friend, and I used to express the fear not that no one would know what we were talking about, but that someone would.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 03:10 pm (UTC)"Girl: I used to have two vibrators, but I broke 'em both.
--14th St"
...and that was on my behalf...
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 04:17 pm (UTC)...yeah.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 07:54 pm (UTC)I name pretty much everything I own.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 03:27 pm (UTC)please to be defining "romantic context"?
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 03:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 10:28 pm (UTC)I'm a bit of a Voldy-shipper myself, I'm afraid to say. Your quote sort of made my day, even after you clarified. Squee!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 10:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 10:44 pm (UTC)I clearly also need more well-written Snape/Voldemort and/or Peter/Voldemort fics, despite the fact that I really do approve of the ship that was introduced in book 7 (not mentioning it just because I dont want to spoil anyone who hasn't read the last book yet). They are both frustratingly difficult to come by!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 10:51 pm (UTC)I hate that Peter has been thrown away. I really like him a lot, and particularly enjoy writing about him and playing him. OF course, my version of Peter is typically transgender too, so ...
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 10:52 pm (UTC)Peter as trans is one of those things that works weirdly well with the film portrayal.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 11:02 pm (UTC)As for the ship I didn't name, definitely. Works well in the books, but that degree of feeling is less likely outside of the books. In any case, I prefer the idea of a Snape who had other relationships. Nonetheless, I ship Snape/Voldemort a bit less these days. Not with the interest I once had. Though I'd probably read Voldemort/almost anyone if it wasn't chan.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 11:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 11:09 pm (UTC)I do think Bellatrix/Voldemort is the most interesting if it's unrequited, though. Someday I'll have to blather about my take on Bella/Rhodolphus.
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 11:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 08:29 pm (UTC)How funny!
no subject
Date: 2007-09-19 10:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-09-30 04:56 am (UTC)http://www.overheardinnewyork.com/archives/011832.html