Writer's Block: The Greenest Grass
Apr. 17th, 2009 11:55 am[Error: unknown template qotd]
Where do I start with the problems with this question?
Gender essentialism flame-war Friday? or the rather obvious questions of privilege?
And that aside, is this rocket science?
Men are less likely to be raped; and more likely to earn higher wages for comparable work.
Women are more likely to get free drinks in bars and are expected to dedicate a higher percentage of their on-average lower incomes to maintaining their appearance.
And when people point this out, some asshole always shows up to say "but it's so hard to be a man; we're made to feel bad for desiring women all the time."
Oi. LJ!
Where do I start with the problems with this question?
Gender essentialism flame-war Friday? or the rather obvious questions of privilege?
And that aside, is this rocket science?
Men are less likely to be raped; and more likely to earn higher wages for comparable work.
Women are more likely to get free drinks in bars and are expected to dedicate a higher percentage of their on-average lower incomes to maintaining their appearance.
And when people point this out, some asshole always shows up to say "but it's so hard to be a man; we're made to feel bad for desiring women all the time."
Oi. LJ!
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 04:04 pm (UTC)Men get raped quite often too, they just don't report it because that's womanly.
Men are more likely to get beat up or killed for acting outside of their gender roles.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 04:13 pm (UTC)Gender roles gets tricky. There's a lower tolerance for any deviation among men, so, I suspect women get more flexibility in minor deviation.
But major deviation? Women in the military or other male-dominated environments, FTM trannies, etc. I'm not sure the gap is as wide.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 04:05 pm (UTC)So, who wants to send
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 04:05 pm (UTC)On the other hand, LJ will be rubbing their hands gleefully because ooh, made 'em write.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 04:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 04:11 pm (UTC)And that's just addressing people who adhere to arbitrary gender roles.
Your point. (S)he is invalid.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 04:38 pm (UTC)When all the chits and points are added up, males have it much, much easier.
As a male, I'm all for having a civil discussion about whatever obstacles it is that males experience, but as a rational being, I'm all for not being deluded.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Gavin & Stacey
Date: 2009-04-17 04:11 pm (UTC)When William S. Burroughs described the US as a "matriarchal society" was he just being insane? Or did he have a point?
Re: Gavin & Stacey
Date: 2009-04-17 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 04:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 04:39 pm (UTC)*For maximum effect, this has to be pronounced in the proper Atlantic Canadian manner: SOO-kee BAY bee!
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 05:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 05:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 05:10 pm (UTC):D
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 05:28 pm (UTC)The question I'm reading in the box is It's our birthday, a day when you get to indulge in all your favorite things. So indulge us—what's your favorite LJ entry? and this is obviously the question the rest of the world is seeing.
What is this person asking?
writer's block question as seen on Firefox
Date: 2009-04-17 05:54 pm (UTC)Submitted By [info]rona_emo
N.
Re: writer's block question as seen on Firefox
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 05:31 pm (UTC)What I see is a fairly innocuous "what's your favourite LJ entry?" not an attempt to start a battle of the sexes.
Is this a Firefox vs. IE issue?
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 06:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 07:58 pm (UTC)Sometimes it really does feel like, purely in the realm of social capital in middle-class, educated, white, America, men have it harder.
In life, overall? Not so much. Not even within that narrow community.
[The biggest problem, as I understand it, with the "but it's so hard to be a man" argument is that it shifts scope in a way that makes it sound like the negative social capital on the one hand is in any way comparable to safety, economic status, political capital, and more on the other hand. Also that it's frequently raised when only tangentially related to the topic at best. Please correct me if I'm wrong, either in this understanding, or in feeling that the discussion is more relevant here.]
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 09:53 pm (UTC)I'm sure that most people who answer "men" will receive accolades for seeing the "truth" too.
What really shits me about this stuff, is so many people (though not all) who are concerned about the society problems that men face as the result of patriarchy blame feminism for it, when really, feminism helps SOLVE those problems, even when it's not the main focus. Want equal custody to be the norm? Well, if equal parenting was the norm, like feminists generally want it to be, then THAT WOULD HAPPEN. You feel like all men are treated as potential rapists? Then STOP BLAMING WOMEN WHEN THEY ARE RAPED -- this just creates a culture where women HAVE to view all men suspiciously, because we know that if we do get raped, then we will be held accountable for being in his company. Want boys to have as many clothing options as girls (not that I see girls exercising their ability to dress boyishly very often) -- then stop making out like anything "feminine" is bad and a step down in the world. Fucking hell.
(Obviously, this rant is directed at society at large, not you. :P)
no subject
Date: 2009-04-17 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-18 02:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-18 04:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-18 09:55 pm (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mu_(negative)