You know, it scares me when I have to say that comparatively, DW/TW/SJA fandom is so sane, but it is, especially in comparison to the antics over in Supernatural fandom ("let's send RPS to the actors" and "let's call security on the actors' gfs") and now SGA fandom (poor bastard). Of course, I know not to tar whole fandoms with the crazy brush, and I'm sure it will be my poor little fandom's turn soon, but perhaps, oh perhaps, we will heed these cautionary tales of batshittery. At least our bad boundary stuff has mostly happened in private. Christ.
Saw the SyFy name change ads on the bus this morning. STILL WRONG.
Forgot to mention I saw the preview for the new Trek when we saw Watchmen the other day. It looks AWESOME.
Orson Scott Card has joined the board of NOM or 2M4M or whatever the anti-gay marriage gathering storm bigots are calling themselves this week. No, I'm not surprised. And at this point, one can hardly even be disappointed. But I am, just a little, because at a given point you just run out of ways to boycott the work of someone that objectionable. That's right, I'm annoyed because I can't find a way to reject Card and his work enough.
Working my butt off. Lots of wacky freelance writing and deadlines for the Germans. In limbo on various creative/criticism projects. Fighting pothos.
Woo! Hey, got a CoT nomination for that Jack/Andy/Ianto porn I wrote the other day. Meanwhile, trying to finish a ton of small stories and feeling increasingly dubious I will make the Tardis Big Bang deadline. IHNIIHBT and one of its installments (The Most Beautiful Girl in the World) also won some other awards a couple of days ago. Yay.
Patty, still in Atlanta. Cool things there yesterday, but for her to tell.
Leverage, Burn Notice, Torchwood - even Dr. Who. due South ... few female characters but they didn't kill them off on a regular basis. Dresden Files ... there are, and were, a great many shows that are better than Supernatural in treatment of women and POC.
And, really, shows that emphasize men or male friendships/relationships don't have to be inherently misogynistic. And I certianly won't buy that I am that misogynistic.
I've seen neither Leverage, Burn Notice nor due South, so I can't comment. I bet however that if there are few female characters in them, an argument for misogyny on their part could be made, as it is frequently for both Torchwood and Doctor Who, some of which I agree with and some of which I don't.
SPN is about only two characters, both of whom are male. Supernatural kills almost everyone who isn't them off on a regular basis! (It actually kills the brothers off too... they just get to come back.) Almost every character we meet who isn't one of them dies horribly... Is that necessarily a sign of sexism? Ought the women and people of color be spared, when the white male characters also die horribly?
The main writer -- Eric Kripke is a straight white dude, true, and his biases certainly show through, and as far as I am aware everyone who writes for the show is white (though there are many women on the writing team as well.) But I'd argue this is vastly the case in the Whoniverse as well... For instance, is there one single S. Asian character in that universe who is depicted in a strong and positive light? Who lives? I think right now on that front, we're at a clear zero. Where as in SPN, I could point to several females & poc who are shown as both, and live...
Women's Work (http://www.imeem.com/luminosity/video/MubmmEnZ/spn-womens-work/) by luminosity and sisabet is a fabulous visual argument for the point you raise... and it's a spectacular vid. I love it.
But I think it ignores the point that you do have incredibly strong female characters who are flawed (because everyone in SPN is flawed) and while they frequently die, so does everyone not named Sam and Dean (and they die, but get to come back). Now it's also true that because of certain sections of fandom, it's been hard to incorporate women into the show, because people bitch. But are we to accuse the show of being misogynistic because it caters to women who don't want to see women on a show they love?
I don't think I'm making personal accusations about misogyny, but I do think there's a greater sense of interest in the stories of men, or rather, stories about what in our society are generally coded as peculiarly masculine forms of honor and heroism and adventure. Is that misogyny? I don't know. But those are the stories we have on the table now, and I think it's possible to enjoy them without being a misogynist. I still love Torchwood and Doctor Who, and I don't think I'm a traitor to my people.
Is there misogyny in the show? Sure, probably, insofar as our entertainment industry is misogynistic. (Do I think SPN is more misogynistic than that? I absolutely do not.) Not to say there isn't interesting stuff about the interaction between women and men, fandom and authors on the show -- there is, and I find it fascinating, actually. Picking it apart, pointing it out -- all valuable.
Thing is, I'm not about to give up on stories I love because our culture sucks! Plus, even when they try and "reform", frequently they do it wrong, as the latest cultural appropriation drama shows us. Consider Buffy or Dollhouse, both by self described feminist Joss Whedon (who I love!) It failed at being feminist so hard. I still love Buffy though. It was a great television.
Perhaps it's more valuable to try to add more voices to the conversation. Get stories out there that more accurately reflect what OUR ideals are, whether we're queer, feminist, or poc. That doesn't mean we have to chuck the other ones though -- 'cause there goes an entire two centuries of fantasy and sf.
For instance, is there one single S. Asian character in that universe who is depicted in a strong and positive light? Who lives? I think right now on that front, we're at a clear zero.
Did you get that email I sent you about the TW radio plays?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
rm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2009-04-24 08:04 pm (UTC)Leverage, Burn Notice, Torchwood - even Dr. Who. due South ... few female characters but they didn't kill them off on a regular basis. Dresden Files ... there are, and were, a great many shows that are better than Supernatural in treatment of women and POC.
And, really, shows that emphasize men or male friendships/relationships don't have to be inherently misogynistic. And I certianly won't buy that I am that misogynistic.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-24 09:43 pm (UTC)SPN is about only two characters, both of whom are male. Supernatural kills almost everyone who isn't them off on a regular basis! (It actually kills the brothers off too... they just get to come back.) Almost every character we meet who isn't one of them dies horribly... Is that necessarily a sign of sexism? Ought the women and people of color be spared, when the white male characters also die horribly?
The main writer -- Eric Kripke is a straight white dude, true, and his biases certainly show through, and as far as I am aware everyone who writes for the show is white (though there are many women on the writing team as well.) But I'd argue this is vastly the case in the Whoniverse as well... For instance, is there one single S. Asian character in that universe who is depicted in a strong and positive light? Who lives? I think right now on that front, we're at a clear zero. Where as in SPN, I could point to several females & poc who are shown as both, and live...
Women's Work (http://www.imeem.com/luminosity/video/MubmmEnZ/spn-womens-work/) by luminosity and sisabet is a fabulous visual argument for the point you raise... and it's a spectacular vid. I love it.
But I think it ignores the point that you do have incredibly strong
female characters who are flawed (because everyone in SPN is flawed)
and while they frequently die, so does everyone not named Sam and Dean
(and they die, but get to come back). Now it's also true that because of certain sections of fandom, it's been hard to incorporate women into the show, because people bitch. But are we to accuse the show of being misogynistic because it caters to women who don't want to see women on a show they love?
I don't think I'm making personal accusations about misogyny, but I do think there's a greater sense of interest in the stories of men, or rather, stories about what in our society are generally coded as peculiarly masculine forms of honor and heroism and adventure. Is that misogyny? I don't know. But those are the stories we have on the table now, and I think it's possible to enjoy them without being a misogynist. I still love Torchwood and Doctor Who, and I don't think I'm a traitor to my people.
Is there misogyny in the show? Sure, probably, insofar as our entertainment industry is misogynistic. (Do I think SPN is more misogynistic than that? I absolutely do not.) Not to say there isn't interesting stuff about the interaction between women and men, fandom and authors on the show -- there is, and I find it fascinating, actually. Picking it apart, pointing it out -- all valuable.
Thing is, I'm not about to give up on stories I love because our culture sucks! Plus, even when they try and "reform", frequently they do it wrong, as the latest cultural appropriation drama shows us. Consider Buffy or Dollhouse, both by self described feminist Joss Whedon (who I love!) It failed at being feminist so hard. I still love Buffy though. It was a great television.
Perhaps it's more valuable to try to add more voices to the conversation. Get stories out there that more accurately reflect what OUR ideals are, whether we're queer, feminist, or poc. That doesn't mean we have to chuck the other ones though -- 'cause there goes an entire two centuries of fantasy and sf.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-24 09:47 pm (UTC)Did you get that email I sent you about the TW radio plays?
no subject
Date: 2009-04-24 09:48 pm (UTC)