here, have some fail
Oct. 12th, 2009 06:37 pmApparently women and queers are ruining SF.
Torchwood gets a not insignificant amount of text, and, sadly, Dirk Benedict is referenced. If you're thinking this can't end well, you'd be right.
Maybe I'll actually pick it apart for your viewing pleasure later. But maybe I'll actually have something more useful to do instead, like ruining the genre with my homosexual girl-bits or the cock in my dresser drawer or something.
Tell me, SF-ruiners, what's on your agenda today?
Torchwood gets a not insignificant amount of text, and, sadly, Dirk Benedict is referenced. If you're thinking this can't end well, you'd be right.
Maybe I'll actually pick it apart for your viewing pleasure later. But maybe I'll actually have something more useful to do instead, like ruining the genre with my homosexual girl-bits or the cock in my dresser drawer or something.
Tell me, SF-ruiners, what's on your agenda today?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 02:46 am (UTC)Is the cock for meat purposes, or is it for fertilizing the eggs of the hens being kept in the wardrobe?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 02:53 am (UTC)But tomorrow I will ruin science fiction by...
* alphabetizing science fiction books at my bookstore not-a-job [GASP!]
* selling science-fiction-themed toys, books, DVDs, and audio dramas to men and women [CONSTERNATION!]
* being a vagina-owner with a science-oriented mind [HORROR!]
Icon chosen deliberately, because I'm proud to put pussy in my sci-fi. [grin]
no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 02:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 03:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 04:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 03:37 am (UTC)End well? I don't think I want to think about how it could possibly go downhill from the first sentence.
...I don't think I can make myself read the rest of that, and only partly because I haven't finished watching season one of the new and girlified BSG yet and don't want to risk spoilers.
I'd make a joke about how the women and queers ruining sci-fi is a plot to convince everyone that the Jews don't run Hollywood anymore, but then I'd have to find out that there are some people who think that's true, and that would make me sad.
Tell me, SF-ruiners, what's on your agenda today?
It's a bit late to work on today, but the collection of short stories in a shared universe that a friend and I keep joking about writing: QUEERS IN SPAAAAACE!!!! just got bumped up to the front of my brain again.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 04:21 am (UTC)I have been woefully remiss at ruining anything today. I've been too lazy.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 05:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 04:34 am (UTC)On second thought, it does get lonely in the observation post here. I'm glad to have some company in watching this particular branch of insanity -- classified as Geek Misogynistic Screwheads. But trust me, you've only scratched the surface.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 05:04 am (UTC)Hmm, let's see, what's on my feminist anti-sf agenda? Draw and write more of my apparently subversive comics, and contribute to the castration of our macho heroes.
After that? The WORLD.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 07:56 am (UTC)Discussed the notion with my mother over homemade pizza (I was, in fact, barefoot when I cooked this. In the kitchen.) and was told that she got a science fair project from reading sci fi. Bear in mind also, my mother once worked in a drug lab and we have a copy of her thesis somewhere - she has some kind of maths/science background, anyway. But apparently when young she read a story about a man stuck on some other planet that was mostly water and he used iron... fuck I forgot what it was called but my brain is saying iron extraction? but it was to get copper out of the water to build a boat. And that got her super interested in this scientific process.
Maybe she's actually a man. She did do a whole pile of gardening today and works two jobs without crying whenever she's criticised. Then again, five kids had to come from somewhere...
no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 02:48 pm (UTC)Sounds like icon-fodder to me, heh.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 08:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 02:49 pm (UTC)The interesting part is, if you cut out all the instances where he references gender (or respin a couple), I can come up with the following complaint, which I share to a certain extent:
In an attempt to capture the "female demographic," the artist formerly known as SyFy has been dumbing itself down horribly, and the other networks are not much better. (The fact that the pursued females are insulted and turned off by being stereotyped is a separate issue.)
It's very difficult to find hard SF that makes any attempt to come up with a coherent and believable technology setup, which is one of the appeals that gets young people into science. I like hard SF, I feel like there used to be more of it, and I'd like it to come back, because the soap operas are winning.
**
Personally, as me and not my little summary, I love soap operas. I love following their crazy sprawling dramas, and the ratings say the world is with me. (Thank you, Babylon 5 for bringing this to sci fi producers' attention.) But I'd also like the Doctor's screwdriver to actually take some time to open a door, and not just be a Potteresque magic wand of doin' stuff.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 03:22 pm (UTC)True enough. Or have the Doctor open a door with Actual Science that isn't the sonic screwdriver (ISTR in one of the Cushing movies alt!One opens a door with a plastic comb because it's an insulator.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 03:26 pm (UTC)Instead I think I'll send his address to Kirk Cameron with the notation 'Happy to help with anything, send more info'
no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 03:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 05:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 05:27 pm (UTC)" This season three gay characters will be added to various shows on “Syfy”, one of which will be part of a “communal marriage” with “heterosexual and homosexual couplings”. This will mean less programming where men actually do things and more relationship drama, driving away even more men from the channel."
The horror. The HORROR!
So I guess Men doing Things doesn't include doing Each Other. That would be . . . unmanly?
I think I'll go watch some more first season Star Trek tonight. After all, Kirk and Spock *never* got up to anything on the Enterprise during those longer spacely nights.
Be still my most powerful and queer of girl parts -- my brain.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 05:49 pm (UTC)Lots and lots of hands-on chemistry experiments, followed by some electromagnetic simulation. Then tonight I'm hosting a movie night.
Not SF-ruining maybe, but science-ruining enough for that... writer guy, isn't it?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 07:20 pm (UTC)No sane woman would breed with any man who thought this way anyway, so they're like a dinosaur's last bellow before dying.
no subject
no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-13 10:59 pm (UTC)While the original series had its problems, it was more standard science fiction with men doing and accomplishing things.
LOL WUT? I can only invoke Poe's Law, that piece is its own best parody.
A lot of the rest of that site isn't quite so funny, though.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 12:24 am (UTC)So 50 years ago the complaint was about black people in SF. Now the complaint is about gays and women. What group will this focus on fifty years from now?
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 01:13 am (UTC)Reminds me of a joke (my apologies to the good guys out there):
How many straight white males does it take to turn on a light bulb??
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...None! They just stand still and expect the world to revolve around them!
Are you sure this article wasn't written by Rush Limbaugh?
Well, off to put on my butch pants and slay a few dozen aliens, and shag the rest. Oh the humanity!
no subject
Date: 2009-10-14 05:16 am (UTC)