Anyway, last night (when I had no Internet! it's broken at home again)
So! There's a scholarship opportunity. And there's some important concerns about it. And now you have links to both. As always, I appreciate when you guys have got more than I've got on things and can help me fail better.

no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 03:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 01:45 am (UTC)As a gay Washingtonian 18-year-old, I'm not thrilled that I won't be able to be legally married as the current law stands, but I am relieved the domestic partnership law does at least provide the rights that same-sex couples currently lack (except the word "marriage").
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 06:54 am (UTC)Which we knew, of course, but now we have something to point to when talking to people who try the "well, why aren't civil unions good enough?" tack; I'll just say "apparently they're still too good for 48% of Washington to let same-sex couples have them, so maybe you should recheck your assumptions".
The new DP law is better than not having it, but...well, I've read the WA Supreme Court ruling in Andersen v. King County, and in my layman's opinion it's a steaming pile of crap. (Gays are too politically powerful to be a suspect class for discrimination? I think not.) The best one I've read was Iowa's, though I have a soft spot for the Massachusetts Goodridge ruling. (Five years later: Sky still not fallen. Divorce rate still lower than the US average.)
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 04:17 pm (UTC)