Anyway, last night (when I had no Internet! it's broken at home again)
So! There's a scholarship opportunity. And there's some important concerns about it. And now you have links to both. As always, I appreciate when you guys have got more than I've got on things and can help me fail better.

no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 02:36 pm (UTC)Yeah, it wasn't like he wasn't willing to wade into state politics before the most recent round of elections
Bill Thompson COUGH COUGH...Apart from a couple of asshats who are getting ripped to pieces by the relevant ONTD comms, yes, I'm also glad that the reviewers are recognizing in Precious a film that isn't comfortable, but is very human and very necessary.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 02:44 pm (UTC)But yeah, the whole It's All about the Mens... not new, but at least it's News :P
In the local papers there was a very big emphasis on the fact that the shooter was of "Palestinian Origin" - so, yeah.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 02:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 02:48 pm (UTC)I am so sick and tired of hearing about the opressed white male. Go spend time as a slave, then you can complain. Live your life with a 1 in 3 chance of being raped or beaten, then you can complain. Have your entire immediate family gassed, stoned, murdered, then you can complain.
You don't automatically get all the good jobs, cause the others are better, smarter, work harder than you - tough. You don't get people kissing your ass because of your sex and gender - tough. You actually have to earn what you get instead of it automatically being conferred on you - tough.
And yes, I know there are plenty of nice white straight men out there - but to all you Rush Limbaugh loving, Fox News watching, Glenn Beck idolizing aggrieved and oppressed white men - let me as a straight white female say - FUCK YOU! As a Jew, let me say - FUCK YOU TWICE! As a member of PFLAG, let me say - FUCK YOU THREE TIMES. As a proud Liberal with a capital "L" - well, you get the idea.
How many straight, white men does it take to screw in a lightbulb? None, they just stand still and expect the world to revolve around them.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 02:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 02:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 03:18 pm (UTC)When the shooter's name was announced my first thought was "How many times are we going to hear 'Pres. Barack HOOOOO-SANE Obama' in the next few weeks?" What is also going to be interesting is how the fact he was a psychiatrist is going to get addressed. It is known that people who treat PTSD in others can develop it as well.
However, I have noticed that very often folks on the more conservative side of things tend to be skeptical of not outright hostile to the field of psychology. What with the whole "talking about feelings" thing and "effete", "elitist" self-reflection. That, or the accuse the profession of "finding excuses" for behavior. (rolls eyes)
That, and it took decades of advocacy to get PTSD recognized by the Govt as a "real" affliction for vets coming back from Vietnam. Will this incident cause mental health issues in the Armed Forces to finally be taken seriously, or will Dr. Hasan be used to accuse mental health professionals to be accused of being a fifth column?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 03:22 pm (UTC)I'd love to believe so, but the precedent isn't favorable.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 03:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 07:21 pm (UTC)Terrorism
Date: 2009-11-06 03:26 pm (UTC)Re: Terrorism
Date: 2009-11-06 03:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 03:32 pm (UTC)Wow, I knew Stanford White was quite the wild thing of his era, but this is a new twist.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 04:03 pm (UTC)One thing I read but have yet to verify , is that he was written up multiple times for telling his patients to turn to Islam as a method of dealing with their problems. Not to pick on Islam, but trying to convince someone that the solution to their emotional/combat stress/etc problems is religion is a bad thing all around. If a individual decides to choose religion as a method to deal with it - that's one thing ... but to have a specific religion spoon fed to you by your doctor during treatment ... that's bad IMHO.
Also I think that all religions suffer from damage to reputation due to the 1% of their members who do stupid things, however not all of them are treated the same way. For example if a person who practices Islam goes on a shooting spree and people rally against it , it's called anti-Islam rhetoric, but when a Christian shoots a doctor who performs abortions and there is backlash against Christians it's not called anti-christian rhetoric.
I have a few friends who practice Islam , and they are not planning to blow up anything or run around shouting 'death to America' or other stereotypical actions. The same goes for Christians ( most of my Christian friends are pro choice ) and Catholics ( who have never molested a child nor would they ever want to).
I think that when a person does something off the charts, as a society we look for the lowest common denominator and blame that for their actions. We have preconceived notions fed to us by popular media & social norms and jump to them effortlessly. I don't think Islam is a special case.
Here is how it can work .. and note that I do not approve of this kind of thinking nor does it reflect my thoughts or opinions ...
If the shooter was white , and male the assumption would be that they are a gun nut hoarding AK47's for the day the commies attack.
If the shooter was black and male , the assumption would be that they are a bad home life and ghetto upbringing / rap music / no father criminal.
However , if you were to add religion to the mix ...
If the shooter was white, male and Christian the assumption would be that the were a religious zealot acting out on their interpretation of the bible
If the shooter was black, male and practiced Islam , the first word on the lips of millions would be " terrorist "
In general facts take a back seat to something easy to swallow that does not take much time or brain power to produce. Luckily we have " news " outlets that are happy to provide that. Granted this does not apply to many people, and especially many people here , but I feel we are in the minority.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 05:23 pm (UTC)I think that's because the backlash you're talking about is very different. Take the first case, with a hypothetical Muslim shooter. Even if the crime had nothing to the person's faith, you're still going to hear a lot of nasty rhetoric about Islamists and terrorists. Internet commenters on news sites are already lining up to attribute the Ft. Hood shooting to the man's faith and background, and were even before reports started coming in (whether true or false) that seem to substantiate that. Fox News reporters last night were actively trying to find that the man had converted to Islam or had extremist beliefs. More, many Americans tend to conflate "religious extremist" with Islam itself, rather than to the person who belongs to the Muslim faith. You hear a lot of rhetoric about the violence and hatred inherent in Islam whenever a Muslim does something criminal. When Muslim = fundamentalist = terrorist already in many people's minds, a backlash against Islam is a lot more likely and troubling than one against Christianity would be in another situation.
Whereas in the second case - in which Christian beliefs are explicitly behind the shooting - you might get a reaction against Christians putting their beliefs into action, or against what would be called a fundamentalist ideology within Christianity, but it wouldn't target all Christians. In fact, you'd be likely to hear a lot about how the shooter violated the tenets of Christianity. There are a lot fewer people saying the same thing about Islam, and we're called naive and bleeding-heart liberals for doing so.
Also, I agree somewhat with your four scenarios, but in the Ft. Hood case, I think that If the shooter was white, male and Christian the assumption would be that...he was psychologically damaged by the stresses of seeing the effects of war, and that we should look after the mental health of our soldiers. Being white and being Christian would mean that he would probably have the privilege of having those traits be invisible, leaving people to treat him as an individual rather than as a representation of a minority.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 04:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 04:18 pm (UTC)If it had been a piece of banana, I would have started wondering if any large blue boxes with blinking lights on top had been spotted in the area.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 07:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 04:45 pm (UTC)My response: Pointing out that most previous shooters most likely identified with Christianity but no one says hey! This must be a Christian dogma to kill people!
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 04:48 pm (UTC)So much for Nashville being overrun by bigoted conservatives...?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 05:03 pm (UTC)I haven't heard any of the allegations that Hasan was giving religious advice to his patients, but if he was, I still wouldn't automatically point to "terrorism" as an explanation for his actions. Some doctors, despite the rules that may be laid down in their health institutions about respecting patient beliefs and not discriminating against anyone for their religious beliefs, will always feel that they are above the rules, and that could be a personality thing, not necessarily a religious fanatic-thing. It would still be unethical, but it wouldn't spell "terrorism."
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 05:43 pm (UTC)Also, they only mention his occupation once, in the lead sentence, but in a weird, passive-voiced, left-handed way.
WTF. I had to read the article three times before I found it.
Bad, bad reporting!
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 05:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 05:45 pm (UTC)- I really want to see Precious. I should see if it's screening anywhere in my range.
- Agreed on the Obama WTF.
- Fort Hood scares the hell out of me. I've already seen commentary in that vein. Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 07:01 pm (UTC)That being said, if he was behaving inappropriately as a physician, particularly if this was a change in behavior, someone should have done more than 'write him up.' I wouldn't be surprised if the fact that he was a psychiatrist deterred anyone from making him get some help.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 07:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 07:13 pm (UTC)Asked whether the shootings were a terrorist act, Lt Gen Cone said: "I couldn't rule that out but I'm telling you that right now, the evidence does not suggest that."
Four paragraphs after a note that he'd been harassed because of his Middle-Eastern ethnicity, I find that an interesting inclusion, and potentially quite telling. From an overseas perspective, and one where the Army is really very much something that no one thinks about unless they're involved in it in some way, the situation seems to have much in common with school shootings. I imagine people are less sympathetic because he's a fully grown man and should be able to respond rationally to feeling trapped or picked on, particularly as he'd also presumably have to pass psych evals to get into the Army in the first place, because when I see news about school shootings much of the commentary focuses on why the student feels that it's a reasonable option and whether they'd been a victim of bullying or harassment. (Never mind that the most destructive school attack ever was done by an adult.)
(My Ianto says "We do not say the C word!")
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 07:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 11:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-08 01:59 pm (UTC)Warning, Dr. Phil makes sense in this video. Very confusing
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/shoshanna-johnson-calls-out-jag-tom-kennif?ref=http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/shoshanna-johnson-calls-out-jag-tom-kennif