Anyway, last night (when I had no Internet! it's broken at home again)
So! There's a scholarship opportunity. And there's some important concerns about it. And now you have links to both. As always, I appreciate when you guys have got more than I've got on things and can help me fail better.

no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 04:47 pm (UTC)Most recent statistics I've seen seem to indicate a woman stands a 1 in 6 chances of being raped in her lifetime (I'm assuming, based on nothing other than human nature, that 1 in 6 men are certainly not rapists and that the statistic is the result of repeat offenders). I don't know what the statistics are for false rape accusations, but I have a hard time getting my head around the possibility that they could be nearly as high.
While I will agree that false accusations of rape do cause permanent reputational damage and associated emotional anguish (and sometimes worse, there's certainly been a few guys released from death row on some rape and murder things that DNA later showed they didn't do), I think the experience of being raped and being accused of rape are different, in that a man falsely accused of rape, especially if he doesn't remain in one community all his life, will not necessarily have to deal with this bit of personal backstory with every single person he encounters forever; a woman who has been raped, well.... Finally, however, as someone who has neither been raped nor falsely accused there of, I am in fact pontificating from afar.
As far as the joke goes, as a straight white male I find it prejudicial. If you think about it, that joke could be seen as "deliberate debasing of other people because they are are a threat to your beliefs".
If the punchline had been " None, they hire a Mexican to do it " would it still be funny? What about " None, that's what a woman is for " ? They all convey a similar negative stereotype.
I think this is fair assessment, in the sense that the joke is not fair or useful. Certainly jokes like this distort meaningful discussions of privilege, which is real and harmful, both in the latent crap it brings to society (discussions like this that are upsetting for all concerned) and the ability to abuse privilege that many, but not all, members of privilege groups engage in.
The fact is most people have places where they are privileged and where they are not. I have white privilege. And I have skinny privilege. As a woman I have the privilege of people not responding to me with physical fear.
However, as a woman, a gay person, and a person with an invisible illness there are lots of ways my voice and experience are ignored and disrespected and that I am subsequently put at risk because of.
You get a certain degree of privilege because you're a white dude. You loose a certain degree of privilege because you often speak up for the oppressed and you're a big guy.
It's all math, and we're all allowed to be angry about it, but I try to keep in mind that no matter how oppressed I am, that doesn't take away from someone else's different experiences of oppression as well.
(OMG, sorry for my constant editing, but I don't want to muddy the issue or be a douchebag because I can't spell/type).
no subject
Date: 2009-11-06 09:01 pm (UTC)I agree completely. Again, I was trying to show two sides, not say that either one is worse than the other.
I try to keep in mind that no matter how oppressed I am, that doesn't take away from someone else's different experiences of oppression as well.
the ability to abuse privilege that many, but not all, members of privilege groups engage in.
I try to do the same thing, and I appreciate and value the fact that you look at it that way. At the end of the day I feel that if I am to be given this privilege or held accountable for having it without choice, then at the very least I should be recognized as a person who has learned not to abuse it. By saying learned , I mean that I have made my mistakes, but learned and grown from them.