you kinky dino, you sundries
Nov. 7th, 2009 03:07 pmSpecifically, the community says "Gender themes (gender confusion; sex changes; genderfucks; hermaphrodites; cross-dressing or other forms of genderbending; drag queens and transvestites; androgyny; forced feminization; butch/femme; tomboys)."
Department of newsflash:
1. I am not a kink;
2. I am not a "genderfuck," but thank you for playing, and, by the way...
3. What about characters who canonically are or do any of those things (i.e., Desire from Sandman, Pie'oh'Pah from Imajica, etc.) Also the enforcement of gender norms can very much be a kink too.
Anyway, while I totally get the point of the community, they really may want to take a look at the degree to which their verbiage is a pretty vicious, heteronormative fuck you. Also, there's a ton of other really problematic shit lurking on there as well (all virgins are kinks; apparently so is all rape recovery).
(Image created by About.com is of two cartoon dino silhouettes kissing; it makes me happy.)
(I had an excerpt up a moment ago but then took it away, because I'm feeling vulnerable and weird about the whole thing).
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:22 pm (UTC)Seriously? Females who wear pants and have short hair. Really. Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:23 pm (UTC)I mean, just e.g.,nipple play? What includes "play" and what doesn't? How the hell do you police that sort of writing?
How do you decide why a character does anything without destroying the entire narrative?
Maybe I'm being picky and diverting my potential simmering rage at the way this community presents kink and I'm just trying to think how vanilla can be written down, when vanilla, like kink, is a whole slew of behaviours.
*Cheers* Go NaNo Go */Cheers*
In case that wasn't clear, that was me being all cheerleader-y. I'm not very good at that sort of thing, alas.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:24 pm (UTC)ETA: also just posted another little excerpt.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:31 pm (UTC)Did you see
And I am now currently thinking about inserting animals getting diplomas into my current fic, thanks.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:32 pm (UTC)If you are that squicked by two adult males (or two adult females, to be fair), engaging in consentual sexual activity? Maybe Torchwood fandom just not the place for you.
Unless it's "Jack puts up with Ianto going down on him while he fantasizes about Gwen doing so."
Except not so much, yanno?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:32 pm (UTC)Generally speaking, I rather hate the term "vanilla" for non-kink, because it suggests that anything not kinky is boring. But . . . I'm hard pressed to imagine a story that could omit every single thing on that list and still be interesting. Still be about people with actual flaws and problems, not iconic figures of True Love.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:32 pm (UTC)Have not seen
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:33 pm (UTC)ETA: Yes, what you quoted! That's fucked up!
If vanilla sex is PiV my sex life with my Ex was one whole big kink because neither one of us had a P!
But seriously, leaving a hicky?! Are they nuts!
Okay, I'm now feeling the rage from the whole identities =/= kink thing!
ARRGH, once again.
Re:Nano Excerpt - Ha! Merlin! Not my fandom at all (I've seen nary an ep - though when I read "cheekbones" I flashed to James Marsters... how is that for association!).
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:40 pm (UTC)Brothers in arms? Check. One night stands? Trouser bulges? Exposing a woman's breasts? Check, check, check.
opulence, decadence, and sensuality in general
I really need to buy some cheaper sheets. Mine aren't vanilla enough.
It seems the owners of this community might do better to state what they are about than what they're not.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:42 pm (UTC)Voice fetishization (cracking or broken; husky, low, throaty; purring; accents; whispering close to someone's ear)
Some of these are not voluntary responses IRL! What. The. Hell!?! I have never seen such a sex-negative fic comm in my more than a decade of on-line life!
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:44 pm (UTC)Stay tuned.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:45 pm (UTC)Well, there goes all of Firefly fanfic...
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:51 pm (UTC)I certainly experienced that sort of thing irl - it's one thing to love someone who happens to be genderqueer, and another thing to actively fetishise that.
Of course, like I said, I've no idea at all if that's the sort of distinction that they're making or not, but it's what immediately occurred to me.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:54 pm (UTC)Um. What is that?
(I am not stupid, I honestly am not understanding what its useage is- but wouldn't the opposition be...well, I mean, the term doesn't make any sense to me.)
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:58 pm (UTC)Have to agree though- that comm is rather, wow. Is it bad that I can't help thinking, "GOD how DULL"?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 09:00 pm (UTC)Ah, educational day for me. :P