you kinky dino, you sundries
Nov. 7th, 2009 03:07 pmSpecifically, the community says "Gender themes (gender confusion; sex changes; genderfucks; hermaphrodites; cross-dressing or other forms of genderbending; drag queens and transvestites; androgyny; forced feminization; butch/femme; tomboys)."
Department of newsflash:
1. I am not a kink;
2. I am not a "genderfuck," but thank you for playing, and, by the way...
3. What about characters who canonically are or do any of those things (i.e., Desire from Sandman, Pie'oh'Pah from Imajica, etc.) Also the enforcement of gender norms can very much be a kink too.
Anyway, while I totally get the point of the community, they really may want to take a look at the degree to which their verbiage is a pretty vicious, heteronormative fuck you. Also, there's a ton of other really problematic shit lurking on there as well (all virgins are kinks; apparently so is all rape recovery).
(Image created by About.com is of two cartoon dino silhouettes kissing; it makes me happy.)
(I had an excerpt up a moment ago but then took it away, because I'm feeling vulnerable and weird about the whole thing).
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:22 pm (UTC)Seriously? Females who wear pants and have short hair. Really. Sigh.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 10:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:23 pm (UTC)I mean, just e.g.,nipple play? What includes "play" and what doesn't? How the hell do you police that sort of writing?
How do you decide why a character does anything without destroying the entire narrative?
Maybe I'm being picky and diverting my potential simmering rage at the way this community presents kink and I'm just trying to think how vanilla can be written down, when vanilla, like kink, is a whole slew of behaviours.
*Cheers* Go NaNo Go */Cheers*
In case that wasn't clear, that was me being all cheerleader-y. I'm not very good at that sort of thing, alas.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:24 pm (UTC)ETA: also just posted another little excerpt.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:31 pm (UTC)Did you see
And I am now currently thinking about inserting animals getting diplomas into my current fic, thanks.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:32 pm (UTC)Have not seen
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:32 pm (UTC)If you are that squicked by two adult males (or two adult females, to be fair), engaging in consentual sexual activity? Maybe Torchwood fandom just not the place for you.
Unless it's "Jack puts up with Ianto going down on him while he fantasizes about Gwen doing so."
Except not so much, yanno?
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 10:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:32 pm (UTC)Generally speaking, I rather hate the term "vanilla" for non-kink, because it suggests that anything not kinky is boring. But . . . I'm hard pressed to imagine a story that could omit every single thing on that list and still be interesting. Still be about people with actual flaws and problems, not iconic figures of True Love.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:40 pm (UTC)Brothers in arms? Check. One night stands? Trouser bulges? Exposing a woman's breasts? Check, check, check.
opulence, decadence, and sensuality in general
I really need to buy some cheaper sheets. Mine aren't vanilla enough.
It seems the owners of this community might do better to state what they are about than what they're not.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:45 pm (UTC)Well, there goes all of Firefly fanfic...
no subject
Date: 2009-11-08 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:51 pm (UTC)I certainly experienced that sort of thing irl - it's one thing to love someone who happens to be genderqueer, and another thing to actively fetishise that.
Of course, like I said, I've no idea at all if that's the sort of distinction that they're making or not, but it's what immediately occurred to me.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:54 pm (UTC)Um. What is that?
(I am not stupid, I honestly am not understanding what its useage is- but wouldn't the opposition be...well, I mean, the term doesn't make any sense to me.)
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 09:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 09:00 pm (UTC)Still, the creator posted stories for about a week and then eight months of the silence that comes of absolutely nobody buying into the community's purpose. It seems to have achieved the level of obscurity that it deserves without our help.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 10:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 10:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-07 10:59 pm (UTC)Apparently "discomfort during sex" is a kink. As opposed to, you know, a consequence of insufficient lube or whatever.
Referring to the tone of someone's voice is "voice fetishization" and thus too kinky. Has anyone EVER had sex in monotone?
Eye contact as flirting is not permitted. WTF?
Men aren't allowed to wear nail polish, because it's too kinky. Have these people ever been in a major city? Have these people ever had sex?
Aw, hell. I couldn't resist. I wrote a parodical drabble and joined the comm for five minutes to post the thing up. Okay, let the flames begin. :P
Preserved here for posterity in case they take it down
Date: 2009-11-07 11:01 pm (UTC)TITLE: Following the Rules
AUTHOR: amberite
PAIRING: Jack/Ianto
RATING: PG-13 - I used a naughty word! Possibly two!
WARNINGS: None
---
The two of them were in a blank room one day, free of all extraneous objects. "Hello," Jack said in a boring drawl.
"Hello," Ianto said back, speaking in monotone.
"Ianto, would you like to have sex?" Jack said, not making eye contact.
"No, I cannot. You see, you might accidentally jab me with your elbow, and it would be too kinky," Ianto said, looking down at the ground, carefully avoiding seeing his feet or his clothing.
"You know, these rules suck," said Jack in a bored tone of voice. "I think I'm losing my boner. Let's get out of here."
"Let's," said Ianto. So they left the blank room to find a better fucking place, one of their usual [REDACTED] hangouts with more [REDACTED] and [REDACTED].
And then they done sex.
It's a sad day when tomboys are kinkier than ponyboys.
Date: 2009-11-07 11:34 pm (UTC)"Animalistic behaviors and characteristics, submissive (feral characters or behavior; domesticated pet behavior such as sitting at owner's foot and cheeking their thigh; purring; licking; characters objectified as animals, e.g., ponyboys)"
"School themes and fetishization (boarding schools; dojos; scholarly gowns and uniforms; sailor fuku; prep school chic; teacher/student pairings; donnish or professorial characters; prefects/head boys; caning; schoolboy hijinks or sexual discovery; military academies; tutoring and teaching in general; see also Conditioning)" etc.
Re: It's a sad day when tomboys are kinkier than ponyboys.
Date: 2009-11-07 11:58 pm (UTC)Re: It's a sad day when tomboys are kinkier than ponyboys.
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-11-08 12:43 am (UTC) - Expandno subject
Date: 2009-11-08 12:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-08 12:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-08 03:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-08 01:18 am (UTC)I find it kind of odd that the comm feels the need to list all the specific kinks that are outlawed, while still being very vague about it. I think that's the problem with trying to define a comm too narrowly. There's no way you can ban everything that could possibly be kinky to someone. It's impossible and would result in really boring fics. What would be so bad about leaving it up to the writers to decide if their fics fit the comm, and take moderator action only if necessary?
not that there aren't more serious issues here, but...
Date: 2009-11-08 02:22 am (UTC)LOL!
Edited:
"Let me make sweet love to you, My Precious,"
whisperedsaidJorgeGeorge, at a medium volume, confident but not demanding, using the diction of a midwestern newscaster, which Janet of course didn't notice, seeing as it's the closest thing to an American ear as "not having an accent at all."no subject
Date: 2009-11-08 04:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-08 10:44 am (UTC)What is with people who think this way? Gender identification as kink? WTF?! Nevermind, that's a rhetorical question. It just burns me inside.
I need a WTF icon, clearly.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-08 07:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-11-08 07:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-09 04:21 am (UTC)And yeah, I was unaware that simply being something was kinky.