Doctor Who
Jul. 5th, 2010 12:48 am1. HOW CAN ANYONE HATE RIVER SONG? She's Jack, but with tits and frizzy hair. As someone with tits and frizzy hair I hate the haters on River Song. Seriously, the Jack references are SO OBVIOUS -- the drape of that dress is the girl version of Jack's coat; her lines are just as bad, and that teeny tiny blaster is the same model as the one pulled out of John Hart's ass in KKBB. Hell, I bet she's slept with John Hart.
2. I love the 51st Century! Oh, the things this season is doing with the military.
3. Wait, back to River Song.... the very good man she killed... it's the Doctor, isn't it?
4. Wow, I'm working on something related to how sacrifice of one's life is the gold standard for heroism in the Whoniverse and how that prevents the show's narrative heroes (the Doctor and Jack, primarily) from ever being actual heroes by the show's own definintion and wow this episode just handed me everything I needed on a platter with Octavian.
"Ready?" the Doctor asks.
"Content," comes the response.
The Doctor and Jack can never sacrifice themselves for anyone, can never be content!!!!
5. And if you think I didn't find that resonant with Ianto's death too, you're out of your mind.
6. Rory's speech about how the Doctor destroys people because they want to make him proud!!! Spot on! Also resonant with pretty much all the fuckery that goes down in Torchwood.
7. This season is weird in that it feels more like a children's show in pacing, exposition and staging, and yet the dark, dark, dark themes are still there. Silence and genocide! Ah, Doctor!
8. I didn't feel like "Vampires of Venice" was a major episode, but I suspect it will be so in retrospect.
9. Extension of the Weeping Angel mythology is challenging, at least to my Jack/Weeping Angel, eye-gouging sex fic, but I can work with it.
9.5 -- Oh hey, when River tells the Doctor that there's "a thing in there that can't die" did anyone else go "OH SHIT, THE DOCTOR THINKS IT'S JACK?"
10. Yeah, I'm not well.
11. There is truth in the meta on this show.
"That's a fairytale."
"So are we."
!!!!!!
12. Oh, oh, oh the things about death!!! Never being born vs. just dying. The horror of being undone as opposed to dead. Oh!
Right, so in three days I'll be in a plane over the Atlantic. I can't even process it. I think the idea that I can break this mood is probably bullshit. I'm just going to be in a weird space for a few days, and it is what it is.
In speaking with my mother on the phone earlier it occurred to me, not for the first time, but for the first time in a while, that I can only write -- in any genre, really -- from a place of sadness, of longing, of desire, of mourning, regardless of whether I'm writing something sad or not. It's just one of those Ways That I Am, but right now I feel very tired out by it.
My mother was saying how my paper is about something so neat and fun earlier, and I was like "Mom, it's awesome. I love what I'm doing work on, and I think my subject is fascinating, and quirky, and beautiful and really, really elegant. But it's sad. And it's exhausting to have to spend so much time in other people's grief, some of which I share and some of which I don't understand at all. And I do it every day, because I'm looking at everything I'm reading and watching through this lens, every day. I watch a show I love, and I sit there watching it through 'he's dead, he's dead, he's dead' so no matter how excited I am by this scholarship, RIGHT NOW I AM VERY TIRED."
Getting to say that made me feel about 200% better, too. But death project moratorium for a week post-Bristol (it's one reason I'm doing the Imperial War Museum before the conference and not after) before I start working on the D*C presentation. I suspect this will all feel moderately different on July 10. I can't wait. Take me there.
Meanwhile, as much as I don't buy this Doctor as a sexual creature (Nine wanted to fuck, Ten wanted to have his heart broken, Eleven doesn't want to think about how fucked up he was as Nine and Ten), anyone got any Amy/Rory/Eleven that will change my mind?
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 05:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 05:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 05:42 am (UTC)As is the line you cite.
My main religious interest in the RTD years revolves around the Ood narrative and "Impossible Planet"/"Satan Pit". RTD's work has a lot of things that don't work for me or that I find just fundamentally flawed, but I think the things he has to say about desire, language and mythology and how that does and doesn't correlate with our divine natures is ALWAYS interesting.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 05:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 05:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 05:56 am (UTC)New Who, though, is about that. I've just watched some Classic Who and I don't think that's what it was about at all. I'm not quite sure what it was about, but I think one of the things I'm interested in long-term is the question of how the show has changed, fundamentally.
I'm taking a class in the fall on Narrative and Ethics (as in the ethics of a particular narrative, not the ethics of narrative in general). I predict many posts about Who in relation to this topic.
no subject
Date: 2010-07-05 05:58 am (UTC)(I get really into gnostic narratives in fiction, especially ones that seem to appear accidentally or organically. The second Matrix movie (in which I think it's entirely intentional, actually) does this, and it's brilliant and fascinating and then completely not delivered on. But it's why I love the second movie the best of the three, because I kept sitting up and going "they're not seriously....?")