A few clueless slashers fetishize real queer people while throwing in fun sides of racism and misogyny:
http://community.livejournal.com/newtrekslash/268981.html
http://www.seetreklove.com
http://www.seetreklove.com/forums/showpost.php?s=e39b6284f12358bc55546e23865c5597&p=2608&postcount=15
THIS IS WHAT FAIL LOOKS LIKE.
Thanks to
telesilla and
darkrosetiger for the heads-up.
http://community.livejournal.com/newtrekslash/268981.html
http://www.seetreklove.com
http://www.seetreklove.com/forums/showpost.php?s=e39b6284f12358bc55546e23865c5597&p=2608&postcount=15
THIS IS WHAT FAIL LOOKS LIKE.
Thanks to
no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 03:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 03:18 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 03:20 am (UTC)"Not supporting this pairing is like not supporting MLK Jr"??
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 03:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 03:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 03:24 am (UTC)(Or "straight but in love with just this one person of the same sex." Because that's more romantic than being gay. Or something.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2009-07-24 04:06 am (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 03:28 am (UTC)What the hell...?
*sighs*
no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 03:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 03:37 am (UTC)It's not like GLBT Trek fans haven't campaigned, largely unsuccessfully, for queer inclusion on Star Trek for decades, oh no. Argh, so much fail! *headdesk*
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 03:40 am (UTC)and then i wrote meta.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 03:54 am (UTC)All I can do is make sure to pass on the "DO NOT WANT" to my corner of the world.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 04:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 04:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 04:55 am (UTC)I don't want to back down, because if we don't have specific ship in mind (or at least a few suggestions), our request could be answered in a way we had not anticipated.
The gay monkey's paw?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 05:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 05:22 am (UTC)I understand how dumb it is for Star Trek to have *never* had an out gay character. Dragon*Con did panels on it for years. But really now, this is not the way to go about it. Seriously.
And you can't disagree with anyone anymore, because now that's considered "trolling". I mean, come on.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 06:04 am (UTC)Why?! Why is a fandom I hoped to actually get into officially too idiotic, stupid and BLIND for me to enter willingly.
No no no!
This is just... I'm sorta speechless here.
ETA: Are people seriously not aware of what co-optation and appropriation mean? Seriously!
no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 06:10 am (UTC)And granted, being trans I tend to be oversensitive to these things, but when the OP used the term "GLBT relationships," I just wanted to reach through my monitor and whack her upside the head. Seriously. The proper term is "same-sex" when referring to relationships. Nobody cares if a bi person happens to have a relationship with someone of the opposite sex. And WTF is a trans relationship? Trans people come in straight, bi, and gay varieties as well, and some of them have same-sex relationshps.
Of course, the OP was just being a douchebag and giving absolutely no thought to what she (and I just hurt my brain looking at her info page to verify her gender, ouch) was posting, which is the enormous problem -- the complete unwillingness to question any of her own attitudes.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 07:42 am (UTC)Feel free to not explain if you don't want, but I thought I'd ask.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:On a related note, specifically regarding on-line petitions and appropriation
Date: 2009-07-24 08:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 09:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 10:06 am (UTC)THIS? IS WHAT THE ROAD TO HELL IS PAVED IN.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 11:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 01:28 pm (UTC)As in : Nobody seriously thinks that...
But no! The stupid is like Tribbles. Smelly, offensive Tribbles.