White Collar seems to be hitting something in people other than "pretty suits" and "lying liar who lies" and I suspect it's because we see Neal getting that hand-at-the-back mentoring from Peter that I think a decent number of the folks who identified with Ianto really wanted to see Ianto get from Jack (and we don't see it overtly, like we do in White Collar, we had to assume it, and for me, in that regard Ianto had very much arrived in terms of competence by the time of CoE, so I think maybe people didn't just lose the character, they lost the dynamic they both wanted and needed him for, hence the rage in some cases). So I think it's meeting that need for a benevolent but harsh taskmaster thing as gen or as kinky as the viewers want.
Peter makes Neal a finer thing. People _wanted_ Jack to make Ianto a finer thing, but whether he did (whether he tried, whether that was the dynamic there) is far more arguable.
That's what I'm seeing anyway, as someone who wasted a lot of their 20s wanting someone to make me a finer thing and then decided no one else was really worthy or capable of the job (I am not saying this desire is jejune, btw, I am saying this desire led me to be an idiot and didn't work for me; your storybook may vary).
And I didn't watch Torchwood through that lens (I saw Ianto as someone Jack (and others in the past) forced to learn to do such stuff for himself, fast, and I appreciated the relationship for that reason. I also didn't identify with Ianto, which is separate but tangental). Watching White Collar, however, gives me a nostalgia for the desires of my 20s. I recognize, very keenly the texture of the day-dreams it evokes for me.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 01:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 02:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 02:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 02:52 pm (UTC)Also... any particular books you'd recommend for making the plunge to go gluten-free?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 02:57 pm (UTC)You really don't need a book. You can't eat gluten. You can't eat anything that has come into contact with gluten. You can't use a toaster glutinous bread has used. Gluten is contains in wheat, rye, barley, spelt. Oats are generally contaminated with gluten and some people with celiac also can't eat "clean, gluten-free oats" (that's trial and error). You can't have beer. You can only have wheat free soy-sauce, which means no soy sauce out EVER (hint, it's often in BBQ sauce and balsamic vinagrette dressing) unless there is an explicit gluten-free menu. Flour is often used as a thickener in soups and sauces, so ask questions. You can't eat food fried in the same oil as stuff with gluten, so if a place serve mozzarella sticks, no fries for you.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:18 pm (UTC)And this is why I don't use B&Bs they're cheaper and can be nice, but I don't want to stay in someone's home - and I have enough people judging and attacking me without leaving myself that vulnerable
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:26 pm (UTC)http://www.purpleroofs.com/
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:20 pm (UTC)I was wondering why you never responded when I emailed you about heading to the range.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:34 pm (UTC)The other thing I like: the female characters are well-liked. If there's an El-hater community I don't EVEN want to know.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 03:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:24 pm (UTC)I'm only very mildly allergic, thankfully. (To milk, I mean.)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 04:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 05:20 pm (UTC)Okay, the following is all navel-gazing, but may prove relevant to you in some way or other given what you say about your 20s:
One of the great appeals of Ianto, for me, was that I'd lived parts of his timeline -- my life was very suddenly not what I expected it to be at the age of nineteen, and then I met an older mentor and we developed, over about three years, a very difficult-to-define educational and sexual relationship (fortunately I just graduated college rather than, you know, dying; we keep in touch). So you would think that I would be intensely attracted, in a character way, to Neal; identify with him, want to be him, want to write about him, especially given that what you say about Peter's mentorship is very true. But I don't, which is weird.
Maybe Neal is too heroic for me; I have a hard time casting myself as the outright hero. Or Neal is too grown-up; there's something less submissive but more needy in Ianto, it feels like. Neal is a prisoner but could still probably break free; Ianto isn't a prisoner but is pretty much out of options. I do find the Neal-Peter dynamic fascinating, so perhaps it's just that I've got some distance on it now. :D
Hmmm.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 05:23 pm (UTC)Yes. This.
Neal isn't nearly as needy as he thinks he is.
I guess for me, and my deal with Ianto, is I see that character and I think, "I thought I was that guy, and it turns out I'm not." Jack resonates with me for, among other reasons, the fact that he had that sort of relationship with the Doctor and then had to suck it up and accept he can do it on his own and can give to others what wasn't quite given to him -- or at least try.
Neal has a sense of self-hatred and naivete I find very, very scary. He lies reflexively (Ianto, I think lied consciously, even about the small stuff).
Neal doesn't have a great sense of his own identity, I think. Whereas Ianto did. Every fucking moment.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Limited good news on the B&B front
Date: 2010-03-22 07:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 08:58 pm (UTC)*nods* Becca and Alice weren't turned away from a B&B in southern (rural) Oregon, but the manager started acting really hostile towards them after seeing them kiss once - fortunately, it all happened on the day they were leaving. Of course, the difference in the UK, is doing that sort of nonsense is a crime there. We could definitely use those sort of laws.
I'm feeling better and better (and more excited about) the new Doctor Who series and Eleven.
I trust Moffat well more than RTD, and the clips I've seen make me believe Moffat's claim that Matt Smith really was the best person they had trying out. I was dubious about Smith, but I'm pretty hopeful now.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 11:15 pm (UTC)I mentioned this to a friend/coworker whose background is in sketch comedy and she nearly hurt herself laughing and acting something like it out.
Also: I WILL BE IN THE UK WHEN THE NEW SERIES PREMIERES.
I am not jealous. I AM NOT.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-22 11:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-23 12:45 am (UTC)Yes, I think you are spot on here, though as we both already know, you and I disagree about whether or not Ianto achieved the sort of competence you're talking about (to me, the way Ianto died -- not only failing to save anyone, but causing the deaths of a whole heap of other people -- completely undermines any arc about the development of competence).
You also touch on how much we need to assume if we're to interpret the Jack/Ianto relationship in a particular way, and I think that's also an important point. I think one of the things that frustrates me most about Jack/Ianto, particularly its portrayal in CoE, is that although we may have canon snogging and canon shagging, as far as an emotional relationship between the two of them is concerned, we're still in the same position as we are with many non-canon slash pairings (although of course, with many non-canon pairings, there IS a highly developed emotional relationship that is used as the basis for speculating upon the nature of a romantic/sexual relationship between the characters).
For me, actually arriving at a place where I believe in that sort of mutual emotional relationship between Jack and Ianto just involves way too many mental backflips now; there's just too much that I need to both ignore and/or re-interpret in really tenuous ways. For me, imagining a poly relationship between Peter/El/Neal in White Collar (I really can't imagine El not being involved!) feels like far less of a stretch than a mutally caring emotional relationship between Jack and Ianto.
And I'm actually feeling very uncomfortable about that myself, because I see how easily what I'm saying could be taken as, "ostensibly straight characters can carry a queer narrative better than ostensibly queer characters do," and that is really really fucked up. I mean, obviously, I don't actually think that, but I can see how it could reinforce certain really damaging dynamics of privilege and heteronormativity regardless. It's difficult for me to tell how much of the fault is mine here (and I am willing to admit that the fault may be mine), and how much lies with the way J/I was written; if the writers really did intend for us to view J/I as a mutually affectionate couple, it feels to me like they were asking us to build a house of bricks out of straw.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-23 02:35 am (UTC)On an individual level, I don't think you need feel bad at all if you prefer the way this other thing is framed, and find it more emotionally satisfying, but if you're going to make comparisions, I'd be wary of implying that it's necessarily about what's a better or more valid queer narrative rather than just one that works better for you, for what you need.
I'd also be aware you're not necessarily comparing like with like - a commonly slashed pairing and an actual canon queer pairing aren't occupying the same niche to start with, IMHO. Canon queer couples aren't under any obligation to be friendly to slashers, nor is their story required to be a love story. As it happens, I don't believe Jack and Ianto didn't love each other, and I don't believe the writers meant us to believe that, but even if they had meant that, that's not, in my eyes, a failure at queer narrative, that's just a different kind of story.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-23 01:56 am (UTC)I think you're right about the appeal of the Neal/Peter relationship to TW fen, at least in that there's something there about power and sharing it that many longed to see with J/I -- whether it's a mentor relationship or something else. I entirely agree that Peter makes Neal better in visible ways, whereas the ambiguity of whether Jack did that for Ianto was part of the allure of that relationship, at least for fic. But I do see Neal as someone who's still trying on identities like so many aliases, and whatever the denouement of the Kate storyline, it's apt to leave him not knowing who he is on some level, unless he invests more in the adult life that Peter's offering.
I do see both Neal and Ianto as preoccupied with self-fashioning in a way that I very much associate with being in my twenties, as well -- although Neal's sense of his own possibilities seems more expansive. Which may be part of the appeal of watching Peter try to rein him in, seeing him voluntarily submit; there's every possibility that he'll gain something more complex but less inchoate to call his own.
There isn't quite the same drive for me to write this as there was (still is) with TW, but like you, I want to worry at the El/Peter/Neal dynamic til I know how it works. It's very odd to enter a fandom with an instant OT3, I must say.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-23 07:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-23 01:07 pm (UTC)