That said...
Dear Everyone Else, I am extremely sick of people calling her "a bitch" and "a slut" and other gendered terms that are about shaming female gender and sexuality because they either are (rightfully) angry about this latest debacle and default to those words (I'm working on it too!) or, and this is what I'm really irritated about, because they don't like that she's marrying Neil Gaiman.
This thing is about Amanda Palmer and who she is in public. While this thing may or may not be relevant to who she or Gaiman are are in private, if you don't know them personally (_personally_, not whatever quirk of internet/celebrity culture put the whole Internet on a first name basis with them) who they are at home isn't relevant to you, and the jealousy and misogyny I've seen directed at her deeply, deeply muddies the water in the critical response to her work and the performance of her public life. Please knock it off. It's not helping, and it's not appropriate.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 09:54 pm (UTC)The other thing that struck me is the bit about"having gay friends makes it ok to make homophobic comments" ... I've been caught in this not in that I made a homophobic comment but I've been in the company of homosexual couples who crack homosexual/homophobic jokes. WTF do you do in that case? Especially when they are the ones who come down on people for making similar jokes. There is no correct way to react. You wither ask them to cool it, and destroy the air , or you let it go and feel like hell inside. The last time this happened to me I was so completely uncomfortable that I tossed one seemingly harmless one back at them and they become very objective right back at me - something I did not predict as happening. I was able to get past it, but a cloud hung over the air after.
Also , the more I look into the humor and race subject it's interesting to find that what some people call racist is really more about stereotype
and not about race. Assuming that all jokes leave one particular person/race/religion/subject looking in a "humorous" light, there should be a delineation between making a race look bad for the sake of race ( racism/nationalism ) and for stereotypical actions of members of that race.
For example to "poke fun" at the Irish for their race is one thing, to "poke fun " at them because of a stereotype ( drinking, eating potato, not working ) is another. Many stereotypes are applicable to many races, so it's not ( IMHO ) correct to consider them inherently racist.
Consider any standard drunk joke. You could have a drunk Irishman, a drunk African-American, or a drunk "Redneck" and the effect of the joke would be the same, regardless of race.
An example of a explicitly nationalist joke : " Two British soldiers walk into a restaurant in Belfast. The first one orders...**BOOM** "
1. The negative light is shone on British soldiers, occupying Belfast.
2. The "humor" is that they are blown up and killed while ordering food, unexpectedly.
An example of a explicitly racist joke : " What's 12 inches long and white? NOTHING. "
1. The negative light is being shown on "White" ( a race )
2. The "humor" is that the implied appendage is quite small within that race.
Thoughts?
( edited to remove unnecessary snark )
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 11:58 pm (UTC)As far as things I'm not aware of , I'm aware of many of the facets of the conflict, but the "joke" is told from one point of view, (and not expressly mine ) and should be seen in that context.
I heard it told in a bar over this past St. Patrick's day - it was not my personal word choice(s).
I observe, listen and try to deconstruct things like this - with my personal opinions & point of view out of the picture and more focusing on the point of view of the person telling it.
Also note that I am using "Joke" and "humor" in quotes as I am painfully aware that these things are not funny to some people. People are sensitive to things, but I am looking at this from the point of view of an analyst and not intending to step on or inflame sensitivities. I believe that it is possible to discuss, debate , and educate on sensitive topics without people prohibiting it due to it's sensitive nature.
The point I was to show the brunt of the "joke" being based on dislike of a person due to their nationality and not their race. If you have a better example , please offer it up.
(Edited to clarify and to fix typos)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 01:09 am (UTC)Overwhelmingly, the joke is a political one, not one about nationality, since issue of the Northern Irish, Irish, and British national identity is a deeply divisive and political issue within Northern Ireland. FWIW I think that joke is potentially equally offensive to either side of the political divide, since it makes light of the murder of one group and stereotypes another as the terrorists. You can't analyse a joke without looking at what it's about, so if you felt you could avoid going deep into that you picked a very bad example - unless what you were really trying to demonstrate is that context and intersectionality plays a huge role in how jokes are recieved, in which case you were bang on.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 08:04 am (UTC)the whole point was one of nationalism vs racism and how they can be confused.
Of course it's equally offensive, but as each person will interpret it as per their own values. I was not arguing that it is not offensive - it is and it can be specifically offensive depending on how you look at it and from what point of view.
Yes my point was that context is a key role in the interpretation of a "joke" that possibly perpetuates a singular point of view by origin, but by interpertaion has multiple possibilities.
My point is not to offend anyone, but to unravel the layers and ways that a person could be offended by it despite the intent of the initial.
I want to analyze it from possible points of view - to inculde the ones I did not take into consideration which is why I put it out for public consumption in the first place. I am not in any way saying that my point of view is THE one and the specific and only - I asked for opinion both to share an open space for consideration and for my own education - to which you have sincerely contributed to.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 02:37 pm (UTC)I appreciate that. This is a conflict which is frequently mischaracterised in ways which can be very damaging (Americans giving money to the IRA, for example, without apparently understanding exactly what they're funding), hence my objection to your terminology. I'm sure you appreciate these are issues which are deeply sensitive and personal for many people (my uncle was a British soldier in NI, as it happens). It's easy enough to tell a joke like that in a bar in Denver; tell it in Belfast at the wrong time, the wrong place, it could be worth someone's life.
Honestly, I doubt you're going to have luck finding any kind of ethnic joke which is less loaded in terms of its political history and intersectionality - the reason these jokes endure is because they sting, and that sting has to come from somewhere.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 01:38 am (UTC)1) Irish is a race now?
2) In general, stereotypes about a "race" are racist. Your three drunk examples are all racist/prejudiced stereotypes. Of course it's possible to invoke a stereotype in ways that turn it on its head or otherwise make it clear that you're not serious, but that brings us to
3) Context matters. The sender matters. Both your jokes read very differently depending on who's telling them. I actually don't think it's the soldiers that look bad in the first one, but rather the people who blew them up. For the record, I'm neither Irish or British, or black, but as an outsider I'd feel a lot less comfortable with a Brit telling that joke than an Irish person (who, absent the right delivery and my knowing them well, would probably still weird me out), because people get to poke fun at their own stereotypes in a way that others don't, as you found out with your gay friends.
And since I don't know where you live, the source of the joke might even have been an American with Irish roots, which I'm pretty sure is a whole other kettle of fish.
4) As for the penis joke, well. For one, less than 12" is not "quite small" and the focus is instead on the foot-long, not-white penis. As, once again, an outsider, the stereotype I see is not the puny-membered white man, but the oversexed black man, and if the speaker is white then, as above, I think that could become problematic very quickly.
4b) On a non-serious note, that's a really bad joke. You know what's 12" long and white? My calf. My ruler says so.
It also says this post is quite long enough.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 02:19 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 08:15 am (UTC)As I , a non participant with limited information , it seems the conflict between two nations - and not tow races. To some people I am wrong, to some I am right. You may be right that I chose a bad example based on my own ignorance / limited education on the situation. I see it as nationalism and not race.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 01:20 pm (UTC)No, it's a conflict within one very divided nation, as I said above; focused on factions within Northern Ireland itself. Hence why the issues of national identity here are so complex.
I'm not sure how the setting being Belfast could possibly be unreflective, since the joke would cease to make sense if you substituted say Paris or New York or even Dublin.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 05:31 pm (UTC)Two American soldiers walk into a restaurant in Baghdad .....
( Not that I have heard this variation , but it could work )
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 08:10 am (UTC)2. I see racism and stereotyping as different things. YMMV.
3. Agreed. Completely. My only objection is that you call these things "my" jokes. they are not mine, they are things I observe and hear in public. they should not be construed as being created nor having agreeing opinions from me.
3a : I currently live in Denver, CO.
4. The whole "joke" is open to interpretation. YMMV.
4b : I never implied or expected anyone to think it was a "good" vs " bad" joke. Again , it was collected form places I have been. I appreciate your candor.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 10:20 am (UTC)2) It's all prejudice in my book, albeit in the shape of a Venn-diagram of some kind. We'll just disagree.
3) No worries, I meant it as shorthand for "the jokes in your comment".
3a) In that case, I really wonder if the jokester was Irish or "Irish", not that you necessarily know.
4b) I didn't mean it as anything against you, only the joke. Its badness just really stood out to me.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 10:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-01 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 10:20 pm (UTC)The pope resigning .....
Date: 2010-03-27 12:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 01:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 04:40 am (UTC)I don't agree with using misogynist insults against her though; there's enough insults you can call her based on the stuff she's actually doing without getting into the gender/sexual based stuff.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 05:11 am (UTC)Rock Stars and Racism
Date: 2010-03-27 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-29 05:56 am (UTC)http://atheism.about.com/od/popesandthepapacy/a/resignations_2.htm