That said...
Dear Everyone Else, I am extremely sick of people calling her "a bitch" and "a slut" and other gendered terms that are about shaming female gender and sexuality because they either are (rightfully) angry about this latest debacle and default to those words (I'm working on it too!) or, and this is what I'm really irritated about, because they don't like that she's marrying Neil Gaiman.
This thing is about Amanda Palmer and who she is in public. While this thing may or may not be relevant to who she or Gaiman are are in private, if you don't know them personally (_personally_, not whatever quirk of internet/celebrity culture put the whole Internet on a first name basis with them) who they are at home isn't relevant to you, and the jealousy and misogyny I've seen directed at her deeply, deeply muddies the water in the critical response to her work and the performance of her public life. Please knock it off. It's not helping, and it's not appropriate.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:13 pm (UTC)This is all I can think about them these days: "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness." Mt. 23:27
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:15 pm (UTC)Considering all the stories I hear about “helicopter parents”, the current generation of twenty- and thirty-somethings seems a little too exclusively attached to Mom and Dad. Maybe their parents should have spent more time leaving them with nannies.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:15 pm (UTC)Hmm, I never thought about it, but that's very true. I wonder why that is, since all the tools are there - that spray Owen uses + retcon... Maybe something about the omni-sexual nature of the show, which means the characters will sleep together without having to be forced?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:27 pm (UTC)Of course, now that I think about it, John Hart does sort of threaten people sexually, but that's like one note in a symphony of threats. I don't see people latching onto it in fic that much.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:46 pm (UTC)*nods* I think that the way the show treats retcon is maybe a factor - it's seen as a tool, mainly. Although Adam of course showcased the dangers of being able to manipulate people's memories... Hmm.
if sex isn't something to RESIST, then there's comparatively less incentive to consider taking it as an avenue of attack?
I think having Jack as the main authority figure is actually quite important in this respect. Jack is overtly sexual, but not when it comes to threatening people. Sex is, although often screwed up (see Gwen/Owen), generally portrayed as a *good* thing.
Must ponder more, my head is full of thoughts and I'm not sure I'm putting things right. It's a very tricky subject.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:51 pm (UTC)I think having Jack as the main authority figure is actually quite important in this respect. Jack is overtly sexual, but not when it comes to threatening people. Sex is, although often screwed up (see Gwen/Owen), generally portrayed as a *good* thing.
This is where I was attempting to go in an unfinished comment, thank you.
A lot (not all) of rape narratives come from a "sex is bad" place, so if you're dealing with a group of characters for whom that's not a trope, you remove that angle. It's very refreshing, honestly.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:53 pm (UTC)Man, this is getting really thorny and our culture is sooooooooooooo screwed-up.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 02:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 02:01 pm (UTC)Sex is bad.
If you get raped, it's your fault somehow. Either you wanted it and are trying to cover your ass after, or you were dressed wrong and sent the wrong message, or you just didn't say no loud enough. The onus is on you, the victim, to have prevented the rape. Otherwise, well, clearly you did want it or deserved it.
Also, a girl or woman who has been raped has been sullied and is a dirty thing. Who wants a dirty thing? You know, because sex is bad and she had sex.
Sex is not a bad or dirty thing on Torchwood, and while there's all kinds of weird things behind any given character's consent, it is always given.
When you're writing Torchwood, which is full of adult characters for whom consent, while may have caveats, is given freely by way of Alien pheremones, brainwashing, or ulterior motives. That is to say, in the moment the consent is given, it is meant.
It's hard to write a rape narrative of the above sort (again, LAZY WRITING WHOA) when a rape victim, in that environment, would receive compassion, help, and retribution, not shame.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 02:08 pm (UTC)Re: That UK book-Oy. It's been my experience that nanny-raised children tend to have issues, but Those Aren't Them. One thing I've observed is that nanny-raised children tend to lack life skills. Example- a friend of my daughter's was spending Thanksgiving with us because her physician parents were working. I asked the young women to prepare the vegetables for the crudite plate. This 17 year old had never handled a vegetable peeler or a paring knife. Another issue I've observed is a lack of what for want of a better term I call 'self-entertaining skills'. I tend to atribute this to the nature of the child/nanny relationship. A disengaged or disinterested caregiver is all too likely to plop the kiddo in front of whatever electronics are available. A conscientious nanny can, with the best of intentions, plan and structure her charge's day so that the child doesn't get that daydreaming, reading, guitar-playing, or fort-building time on his or her own.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 02:20 pm (UTC)THIS. Torchwood takes the motivation to tell that story away by neutralizing (most of) a potential rapist's reasons to use sex as the avenue of attack, as opposed to simple non-sexual violence; if there's no value-added to rendering the attack with a sexual dimension, because you can't plausibly play off of the cultural assumptions about sex that you cite, then odds are your typical writer is just going to go with the straight-up mugging/assault/ohmygodanalienjustrippedmyfaceoff and save themselves the trouble of opening that can of worms, if said can of worms isn't specifically the story they're intending to tell. (Which it could certainly be, I have seen it done even in this fandom, but it means that OMG RAEP isn't automatically a go-to complication to muddy up just any story with.)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 02:27 pm (UTC)I find it very refreshing after my previous fandoms (HP, X-men, PotC) which were full of rape and/or coercion stories, but I keep wondering why this particular fandom works this way.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 02:30 pm (UTC)There's also a fair amount of 'aliens made me do it' sex which much like laura47's comments on Owen's alien spray, has some elements of dub-con at least.
I do agree that the show itself is mostly sex positive - people actually enjoy their relationships with others without guilt and shame - which is pretty refreshing actually.