That said...
Dear Everyone Else, I am extremely sick of people calling her "a bitch" and "a slut" and other gendered terms that are about shaming female gender and sexuality because they either are (rightfully) angry about this latest debacle and default to those words (I'm working on it too!) or, and this is what I'm really irritated about, because they don't like that she's marrying Neil Gaiman.
This thing is about Amanda Palmer and who she is in public. While this thing may or may not be relevant to who she or Gaiman are are in private, if you don't know them personally (_personally_, not whatever quirk of internet/celebrity culture put the whole Internet on a first name basis with them) who they are at home isn't relevant to you, and the jealousy and misogyny I've seen directed at her deeply, deeply muddies the water in the critical response to her work and the performance of her public life. Please knock it off. It's not helping, and it's not appropriate.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-26 02:20 pm (UTC)THIS. Torchwood takes the motivation to tell that story away by neutralizing (most of) a potential rapist's reasons to use sex as the avenue of attack, as opposed to simple non-sexual violence; if there's no value-added to rendering the attack with a sexual dimension, because you can't plausibly play off of the cultural assumptions about sex that you cite, then odds are your typical writer is just going to go with the straight-up mugging/assault/ohmygodanalienjustrippedmyfaceoff and save themselves the trouble of opening that can of worms, if said can of worms isn't specifically the story they're intending to tell. (Which it could certainly be, I have seen it done even in this fandom, but it means that OMG RAEP isn't automatically a go-to complication to muddy up just any story with.)