I worry about my ability to retain information. The lessons last night were mostly easy (and I did all of them, pictures, just spoken, practicing my own pronunciation, writing), but then when I tried to tell Patty about them later, I could explain the grammar things I'd figured out (how "ein Junge" seems to become "einem Jungen" when something happens to the boy and how it looks like "ein Madchen" even though you'd think "girl" would be feminine, because kids are gender neutral and therefore default to masculine), but couldn't remember the word for horse or airplane. Although when I woke up this morning I had those back ("ein Pferd" and "ein Flugzeug").
Meanwhile, my pronunciation is way better than my French, right off. I think both because I hear a lot of German and because the sounds I have to make in German are less "bad sounds you are not to make" in terms of English language speech therapy my accent is not terrible. But I'm still sure, probably in a way that's not helping, that I'll never be able to speak the language because I'll always be too ashamed.
I think, sometimes, because LJ can often be an echo-chamber of those we more or less agree with, how fucking hard it is to be gay. It's not just "oh, the laws suck and haven't caught up with reality yet." I have at least two people on my friendslist with profoundly strained relationships with their parents because they are in queer relationships. And I don't mean strained like "but what about grandkids?" I mean strained like making threats, demanding lies, gender-policing, shame, bullying, removal of resources, isolating from friends and family, other abusive behaviors, etc.
And here I am, out and loud and very much not much one for bullshit, but a week doesn't go by where I don't think to myself that when my mother had me in her mid-twenties I bet she never thought her life would look like this: breast cancer and a gay daughter. My parents aren't even mad or disappointed in me, but all I know from living in the world is that I've probably made them sad.
So, do I hate how much of the LGBTQ rights debate has come to rest on marriage when everything form healthcare to employment to housing can be denied to you simply because you're queer? Ayup. In spite of this, does the marketing person in me think the equal marriage rights issue is sensible from a PR perspective and a potential cascade from which all other rights will come? Ayup. Do I remain deeply conflicted because of the way the necessity of mainstream political activism combined with the AIDS crisis basically destroyed and remade the gay community in a totally different image (in your image, straight world, not ours) in just a few decades? Yeah.
But what's done is done, and hopefully soon we can simply live.
(This rant brought to you, in part, by having to explain the AIDS crisis to someone yesterday. I'll take being too young to remember when cashiers were afraid to take your money if you were male and read as gay because there might be AIDS on the dollar bill and people thought you could get it off toilet seats. But "I'm sheltered"? History is not an R-rated movie, and Wikipedia is a totally appropriate starting place but not a primary source. Thanks.)
Really, I'm starting to even wonder why I read the Times, and that's hard for me to say, as a native New Yorker, an educated person, and a J-school alum.
It occurs to me that part of the problem with the slowly emerging Jack/Auggie fic is we're getting so much new backstory on Auggie every week that I still feel like I am in the middle of a rapidly shifting landscape. But how great was the lie detector scene???? "I have four older brothers, so you'd think I'd learn how to lie." Oh man. Also, still so Jack's type -- tragic past, stubborn beyond what's good for him, thinks he knows better than the folks in charge, keeper of secrets, nice clothes. Also, how much does this CIA remind you of Yvonne Hartman's Torchwood?
no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 02:06 pm (UTC)Um, not nitpicking, honest - I think you have a word missing there, and because I feel that what you're saying is important, I want to make sure I have all of it.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 02:09 pm (UTC)I am not sure people realize that I do not compose these things or ponder them. I just type stuff into LJ and then fix later. Which is a little weird for how much I write, and sometimes, for the style in which I write, but these aren't planned really. Even the long, essay-ish ones.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 02:21 pm (UTC)RE: how hard it is to be gay.
I am not gay ("Straight but not narrow" is my motto), so maybe I don't get to really have much of a say about this, but I was brought up by my mom and dad with a strong sense for HUMAN rights, regardless of who the human was. I was raised in a VERY Irish Catholic family, and I had an uncle who was gay (and not closeted... I mean "queer-as-a-three-dollar-bill" gay!). And while he wasn't always understood by his family (oh, BOY, was he not understood), he was always accepted and loved. And I think that maybe that's the important part... we can't always understand each other (we're only human, after all), but as long as we can accept each other, we can move forward.
Of course, I also have a friend who, when he came out to his family years ago, his father attempted to shoot him dead. Yes, you read that right... shoot him, with a gun, right there in his home. So we probably still have a long way to go. But I hold out hope that we'll get there, one day.
I hope I'm not wrong.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 02:23 pm (UTC)See, as a straight person, you have the privilege of being surprised by this. I don't. That's, sadly, the different right there.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 02:21 pm (UTC)I found myself somewhat shocked with my fervor as I said "You go, Mike Bloomberg!" at the radio.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 02:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 02:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 02:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 02:24 pm (UTC)Junge is only itself declining (rather than the article declining) because it's a weak masculine noun. That seems like it would be reason for Rosetta Stone to avoid it very early on, but clearly not.
/stops talking about German
no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 02:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 02:29 pm (UTC)On the other hand, from the image perspective, it says "we're just like you, we're harmless, we're monogamous; we're not about sex we're about mortgages." It's been an effort to make queer people seem non-threatening. From a marketing standpoint, I get it. I might even advise it. But as a queer person, it makes me a big aggravated. Because I am Not Just Like You. And I shouldn't have to be to be treated like a human being.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 03:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 03:49 pm (UTC)Ugh, agreed. If you must write it because you're rendering things phonetically, *lowercase* it to avoid confusion. Is it that hard?
no subject
Date: 2010-08-05 10:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 04:05 pm (UTC)Re: Prop 8 -- fingers crossed for the right outcome although (as you point out) it's unlikely to change anything in the immediate future.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 04:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 05:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 07:40 pm (UTC)I have the Ultimate Portuguese and Russian sets, have the Ultimate Spanish book (sold separately), and have checked out Ultimate German and Italian from the library. If I had heaping wodges of cash, I'd buy the lot. My only complaint is that they don't have a set for Advanced Portuguese.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-04 11:04 pm (UTC)I hate the idea that I've made my parents sad, as well. Though my bitterness kind of trumps that.
I think I've seen the "Mum" and just replaced with "Ma'am" in my mind, because I've also read a few Big Bangs and don't recall any of those.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-05 12:38 am (UTC)Are gay people not supposed to be just like straight people? I mean, are gay people who are monogamous and into having the house and the white picket fence somehow less legitimately gay than those who aren't?
See, I'm asking this as a bisexual person who really avoided that label for a long time; I think partly because I felt like taking on any sort of queer identity meant that I couldn't just be a regular person anymore; that it would have to subsume my identity and be all that it's about. And I didn't want that. I wanted it to be just another thing about me, like having brown hair or liking science fiction. Not something that my life had to revolve around.
I mean, I'm fine with queer people who aren't like straight people, but I'm also fine with the ones who are. And I kinda like the whole 'gay people are normal people' thing not so much because I think all gay or queer people need to be one way or another, but because I think it allows them the freedom to be 'normal' and white picket fence-y if they want to be. Though I don't think by any means that it should proscriptive.
This is all sounding convoluted and I'm afraid I'm probably going to wind up being offensive without meaning to, so I'll just wrap up by saying that is coming the perspective of someone who always knew she'd never fit into the queer 'scene', so feels better if there's a non-scene way to be queer.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-05 12:59 am (UTC)Patty and I are monogamous. This is neither a queer exception nor a queer rule, it just is.
We don't particularly have white picket fence fantasies because we live in NYC and that precludes large swathes of this.
The fact remains, however, that even in the 7 years I spent with one man, or the many years in which I dated other men and men, the fact that I was queer was obvious. I don't read straight. I have never read straight -- not even when I had long hair and wore dresses and makeup.
When I came out my friends and mentors were older gay men. Their culture and my culture was different. It was not about gender as defined relationally to someone else; it was not about what expectations in or out of bed my gender required of me.
While lots of relationships between men and women (straight or not) also defy gender expectation and roles, they come with them to defy.
Mine to do not. Not when I am a woman with a woman. Not when I am a genderqueer person with a woman. Not when I've been a qenderqueer person with a man.
I can't define your queer culture for you. I can't define queer culture for everyone.
But there were defineable queer cultures that AIDS destroyed. There are defineable queer cultures that have come out of lesbian rights movements, out of the BDSM scene, out of polyamorous communities. There are queer cultures that have come out of politics, out of fashion trends, out of academia.
And many of those cultures are mine. One ones I learned from. Or ones that supported me when my family, my friends, my university wouldn't.
And I resent that I have to prove to people that I'm just like everyone else to beg for my rights. And I also don't particularly enjoy having to reassure other queer people with different lives than mine that there queer is okay too.
Being okay with my life and my vanishing worlds is hard enough (post coming later about why this is, despite being a good day, really fucking hard). I can't do it for anyone else.
I'm incredibly, incredibly sorry if this sounds curt (I'm sure it does because I'm in a mood), because you don't deserve that, I've just had a long day of explaining my life to people, over and over and over, and those people have ranged from allies and community members to folks being right assholes and I'm really tired. Ask me another day, and I may have a better answer for you.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:the "we're not just like you" thing
From:Re: the "we're not just like you" thing
From:Re: the "we're not just like you" thing
From:I vs. We
From:Re: I vs. We
From:no subject
Date: 2010-08-05 09:26 am (UTC)So to hear of him dating women again and even getting married makes me so sad. not from a "he has another woman" point of view, but a "I'm sorry he didn't feel he could live his life as a gay man" point of view. We used to go to pride together, and different events. He was my best friend and for him to reject his sexuality like that makes me wonder what happened in his head when he was so out and proud for a a good 6 months or so. We aren't in touch any more.
no subject
Date: 2010-08-05 01:36 pm (UTC)(Edited because the above sounds horrible: I cannot leave language things alone. They just occupy all the brain space. I need to resolve them or go somewhere else, and I wanted to read the rest of the posting...)
how it looks like "ein Madchen" even though you'd think "girl" would be feminine, because kids are gender neutral and therefore default to masculine),
Never forget the difference between grammatical and natural gender when dealing with German. (Or, I suspect, any language that uses grammatical gender for words that do not map to natural gender.) Also, there are three grammatical genders, here with elementary school mnemonics: masculine (der Hund [the dog]), feminine (die Katze [the cat]), neuter (das Haus [the house]).
There is no default to masculine. What you are seeing with "das Mädchen" is the effect of a diminutive. "Die Magd" (outdated, the maid, the female servant) is grammatically feminine. Add the diminutive "-chen" (or "-lein") and you get neuter: "das Mädchen" (the girl) or "das Mägdelein" (outdated, the little maiden).
You can do the same to a boy: "Der Bub" (the boy, regional use) is grammatically male, "das Buebchen (Bübchen)" has a diminutive, is therefore neuter.
This applies to all words, regardless of their grammatical gender. Diminutive means neuter.
If the umlauts do not survive the posting, I'm going to edit this.
Have you read Mark Twain's delightfully funny essay, "The Awful German Language"?
Date: 2010-08-05 09:19 pm (UTC)I speak some German and love languages, and Twain's take had me about to spit my drink out in SEVERAL places. It also specifically comments on the das Mädchen issue:
no subject
Date: 2010-08-06 02:40 pm (UTC)This comment gave me a chill, how much I relate. After so much battering back and forth, lots of hurt and general badness, my parents and I are somewhat... stable. But underneath it all and never far frrom the mind is the simply fact that they really really wish I wasn't. And that is a huge thing
no subject
Date: 2010-08-10 04:41 pm (UTC)In HTML, the codes are:
HTML table contents extracted from: http://www.evolt.org/article/A_Simple_Character_Entity_Chart/17/21234/