The ability to turn off-cross posting from one's own journal for anyone commenting on public entries does not seem to be something that will be implemented at this time. For me, it's a non-issue, but for people who have their journal set not to be included in search engines and really thought no one outside of LJ would ever see their stuff, it's a shock. While it's not my concern or how I interact with information, people who feel differently than me are still entitled to feel that way.
Additionally, there is some noise about LJ staff with sock-puppet accounts trolling and being abusive on the
For now, I remain here, as this is where my community is. Eventually, I will probably migrate to a non-LJ, non-Dreamwidth set-up under my own domain, by am way too busy to worry about that now.
My experience of working for multiple social media companies over the years is that it is an inevitability that these corporations have profound contempt for their users; the question, really, is only whether you find out about it. Ultimately, the LJ tool serves me far more than random employees bullying the user base serves them. Which is to say, for me, and my current levels of not giving a shit, that while enraged, I come out in the win column. Today, I have other battles to fight.
1. Let's start with apologizing in the workplace. Rightly or wrongly, it's viewed as an act of submission. Saying "this happened on my watch, and this is what I've done to fix the problem" still takes responsibility, but is seen as proactive. Saying "I'm sorry," says you're wasting valuable company time waiting for someone to punish you.
2. If you ever worked for a dot.com you probably heard "Ask forgiveness, not permission" more times than you can count. Lord knows, the phrase practically makes me want to vomit at this point, but the reality is corporations want shit done and shit done fast. This isn't about breaking the rules; that (despite being a part of many corporate cultures, particularly in the financial industry) actually sucks and is something that needs to be addressed. This is about wasting time getting approval to do what you've already been hired to do (they hired you, because they trust your brain) -- take initiave, innovate, and solve problems.
3. Okay, the "playing fair" one sounds extra-sketchy, I admit, and like the "asking permission" one certainly touches on toxic, problematic aspects of corporate cultures. But if you wait until everyone else speaks, if you always defer to the senior person in the room, if you never interrupt anyone, if you believe excelling in something that we're supposed to take turns in, you're going to get steam-rolled. Don't be a dick, don't sabotage people, but seriously, don't wait your damn turn either. This would be better phrased as "do play hard" instead of "don't play fair."
Overall, however, the tone of the list is, of course, deeply, deeply insulting. Women aren't naive or children and Citibank is shooting itself in the foot in more ways than one if they think so. But many woman have received significant conscious and unconscious cultural training to behave in ways that can be perceived as that way.
The other significant flaw of this list is that it does not acknowledge the ways in which some behaviors when engaged in by women look different than when engaged in by men. These include things like aggression, the use of smiles and leaning forward in your chair (in a woman it can often look, not assertive, but over-eager).
America (written right when I came home from Australia)
untitled (written last year)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-13 10:05 pm (UTC)Once I found that folks where I work are pretty understanding on the second issue, it reduced my stress level a lot. But it drove me up the wall as a kid. For example, I was in the driver's seat, and a bit fuzzy on how to get started on route that I had been on a number of times, and so asked Dad for confirmation.
"You know how to get there."
Now, either I was dosed with something, but outside of a courtroom, when someone asks a question, it is because they are asking for info that they don't know? That and there is the whole kind of mindscrewy environment that results when folks who clearly aren't listening to you act as if they know the inside of your head better than you do...
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 06:19 pm (UTC)Edited to add - I do take your point that some of these things could work against you when done to extremes. But that's true of most advice.
Okay, second and last edit (I'm not going to spam your inbox every time my brain synapses fire, I promise) - just for clarity, the two-pay-grades-higher thing isn't a glass-ceiling thing or an inequitable-payment thing. Promotion is very prescriptive in the public service. I'm just not there yet - but I do get invited to listen and talk in more senior quarters, and that is not true of everyone at my level.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 06:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 11:08 pm (UTC)He's sooo cool when he eats :) The other day, I gave him a salad with a big chunk of kiwi in it. He grabbed the kiwi as soon as the plate was in front of him, then ran off with it, holding his head high and proud. I could almost hear him thinking, "I HAS A KIWI AND IT'S ALLLL MINE!!!"
Finally,.
Date: 2010-09-11 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 06:46 pm (UTC)And congrats to Patty!
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 06:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 07:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 07:35 pm (UTC)Gosh, I can't imagine why. *falls over laughing* That is an impressive mix of cuteness and pitch black humor.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 07:37 pm (UTC)But yeah, I had to actually have someone explain to me why it's obnoxious. My first response is always Sad Towers are Sad.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 07:37 pm (UTC)Those are some badass-looking earphones you've got there.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 07:42 pm (UTC)But that's a huge flippin' con and I am but one person. I am at a loss as to how to spread the word (and the ribbons) around.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 07:44 pm (UTC)I really don't blame Dragon*Con for this stuff. It's an inevitable part of large events, but this has now reached a critical mass where they'll need to strategize more of a response.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 07:50 pm (UTC)As an example, I spent two days working (without authorization) on a prototype to replace one program with another. I showed it as a prototype (granted, it was a working one) at the next meeting. It was 4x faster than what it replaced.
Two weeks later, it shipped.
I got a bonus and more free rein to do what I wanted, and I sped up a bunch of other processes internally. Some of the men (I was the only female engineer on the 38-member team) whined that I got "assigned" the cool things, but the truth is, I assigned myself.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 08:24 pm (UTC)Post is <a-href="http://chicleeblair.livejournal.com/337395.html">here
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 08:49 pm (UTC)It's worth noting that ticking the "minimise the inclusion of my journal in search engines" box does precisely that: attempts to minimise the inclusion, not prevent it, as I don't think that can be done. I have a vague memory that it once said "stop my journal from being indexed by search engines" or some such that could have been construed to suggest it would prevent one's public entries from appearing as search results (though I think the FAQ has long said that isn't how it works), so there's some potential for confusion on the part of people (like me) who look at their LJ settings once every few years.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 10:34 pm (UTC)My only grown up job experience is working under a woman who is a serious control-freak/micromanager and who punishes people for taking initiative. While I am the primary problem solver in the department I am basically required to ask permission before I can even THINK about solving it. Over the years I've come up with various ways to deal with this but it's a real pain in the ass.
This is my favorite as well.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 10:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 02:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 02:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-09-12 03:09 pm (UTC)