The ability to turn off-cross posting from one's own journal for anyone commenting on public entries does not seem to be something that will be implemented at this time. For me, it's a non-issue, but for people who have their journal set not to be included in search engines and really thought no one outside of LJ would ever see their stuff, it's a shock. While it's not my concern or how I interact with information, people who feel differently than me are still entitled to feel that way.
Additionally, there is some noise about LJ staff with sock-puppet accounts trolling and being abusive on the
For now, I remain here, as this is where my community is. Eventually, I will probably migrate to a non-LJ, non-Dreamwidth set-up under my own domain, by am way too busy to worry about that now.
My experience of working for multiple social media companies over the years is that it is an inevitability that these corporations have profound contempt for their users; the question, really, is only whether you find out about it. Ultimately, the LJ tool serves me far more than random employees bullying the user base serves them. Which is to say, for me, and my current levels of not giving a shit, that while enraged, I come out in the win column. Today, I have other battles to fight.
1. Let's start with apologizing in the workplace. Rightly or wrongly, it's viewed as an act of submission. Saying "this happened on my watch, and this is what I've done to fix the problem" still takes responsibility, but is seen as proactive. Saying "I'm sorry," says you're wasting valuable company time waiting for someone to punish you.
2. If you ever worked for a dot.com you probably heard "Ask forgiveness, not permission" more times than you can count. Lord knows, the phrase practically makes me want to vomit at this point, but the reality is corporations want shit done and shit done fast. This isn't about breaking the rules; that (despite being a part of many corporate cultures, particularly in the financial industry) actually sucks and is something that needs to be addressed. This is about wasting time getting approval to do what you've already been hired to do (they hired you, because they trust your brain) -- take initiave, innovate, and solve problems.
3. Okay, the "playing fair" one sounds extra-sketchy, I admit, and like the "asking permission" one certainly touches on toxic, problematic aspects of corporate cultures. But if you wait until everyone else speaks, if you always defer to the senior person in the room, if you never interrupt anyone, if you believe excelling in something that we're supposed to take turns in, you're going to get steam-rolled. Don't be a dick, don't sabotage people, but seriously, don't wait your damn turn either. This would be better phrased as "do play hard" instead of "don't play fair."
Overall, however, the tone of the list is, of course, deeply, deeply insulting. Women aren't naive or children and Citibank is shooting itself in the foot in more ways than one if they think so. But many woman have received significant conscious and unconscious cultural training to behave in ways that can be perceived as that way.
The other significant flaw of this list is that it does not acknowledge the ways in which some behaviors when engaged in by women look different than when engaged in by men. These include things like aggression, the use of smiles and leaning forward in your chair (in a woman it can often look, not assertive, but over-eager).
America (written right when I came home from Australia)
untitled (written last year)
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 07:42 pm (UTC)But that's a huge flippin' con and I am but one person. I am at a loss as to how to spread the word (and the ribbons) around.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 07:44 pm (UTC)I really don't blame Dragon*Con for this stuff. It's an inevitable part of large events, but this has now reached a critical mass where they'll need to strategize more of a response.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 10:55 pm (UTC)I think that the con should try to arrange with the hotels so you can't get access to the discount code until you enter your badge number when you reserve online.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 10:57 pm (UTC)And the incident I experienced the previous year was with congoers, sadly, but certainly this year when walking out of the hotels and dealing with street harassment (which I've never experienced at D*C before) it was clearly not congoers.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 11:24 pm (UTC)Frankly, if I but ran the Imperium, the hotels would ONLY be available to Dragon*con attendees, with badge checks at all access points. It won't stop fan on fan harassment, but it will mean the football hooligans have to go elsewhere.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 11:33 pm (UTC)I think we all need to keep on top of the Marriott for this for next year. At least they appear to be taking it seriously.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-11 11:37 pm (UTC)